lfg

So is a challenge

they are no different

now answer my question

if the challenge mode was somehow significantly different than what was previously used, I can consider the challenge mode a sequel to previous challenge modes, if we are to take modes as individual components of the game.

same goes for story

Is the story significantly different though? You have a map, and some challenges, and a loose story on top.

I am willing to agree the fighting mode of the game is more or less an enhanced edition of smash 4 if that makes you happy

yes max

it is significantly different to smash 4

Yet

It's still just a mode

yes max, it is a mode

a mode in which, the only difference is a map, and some story

okay, and?

why does that matter

Because that's not much

because it is a story mode

thus a difference in story is crucial for the story mode to be considered not a port of previous smash story modes

the story mode is not a different entity from the smash game though

it is just another button to reach the stage, another way to meet a means

is it that big of a change to the game

to make it not count as an "enhanced port"

the story mode of smash ultimate is a massive change to the story mode of smash 4 max

yes

in that it actually exists

for starters

It's only a new mode though

another way

Again, and?

to get to that stage and go back to fighting

so how is it that different from 4

And the story of fe 7 and fe8 function the same way, to justify getting back to the turn based stratagy

it is almost like a game frames it story in the game mechanic

Yet theyre a main selling point

they're the focus

that is not what we are arguing

It still holds it up though

"I am willing to agree the fighting mode of the game is more or less an enhanced edition of smash 4 if that makes you happy"

We are talking specifically about the story mode

I never was

story mode

is not

a seperate entity

it is a MODE

in the GAME

You can consider a game to be modular with different modes

all framed in the base mechanics

and yet the mode has provided people to buy the game

for glory in smash is also just a mode, no more valid than offline smash mode

Pika, I think you're wrong

The game of smash, is a fighting game, the mode of "story" is another way to meet the means of the main selling point the fighting, the story mode is an addition, it is not the main focus of the game. It's no different than a side mode, because IT IS A SIDE MODE. Compare the button size for example.

oops

messed up *s

It may provide more

but it is not the main point

All modes equally valid as they should be

same button sizes

kek

Data best mode

fight me

options

Fire emblem you can argue there are two main points, the story and gameplay. While the game-play may be similar, the game is FILLED with new story, it being 100% different.

You know, this probably stems from the fact that I do not care about multiplayer smash

and never have

oh jee i wonder if so

You and I just disagree on what a significant change is, you see story as meaningless, I do not

that is fine

In Smash, the story is not the main point is not the story. The story mode is nothing more than a mode. It being there or not being there is not a MAJOR CHANGE. It is the addiction of something to the MAIN PLATTER

i don't see it as part of the main platter

its a side dish

and that's how nintendo sees it

If you do not agree, check how they advertised it.

and still are advertising it

they advertised the singleplayer story mode pretty well last direct

but whatever, we are not going to agree max

i feel like nintendos trying to make the story part of the main point though, you unlock characters by playing story

They did, but that hasn't been what they have been advertising.

And still are