lfg
<:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> E3 cancelled, E4 is in.
Jump to date
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
maybe smash was do you know Kappa
OK, here's a hard one
What about when they release a new game, that was just two older games merged together?
Like MGQ
port bundle
oh max, I know a better one, is the fe1 part of fe3 a port or a remake Kappa
Where things get hazy are when you have a remake disguised as a port
Like Hat in Time or Rocket League for Switch
Ports, that had to be rewritten from the ground up for a new platform
Okay max, is the story mode of smash specifically a port or a sequel
yeah but lets ignore that since story is irrelevant leg
that seems different than a story mode to me
this is a nintendo party game max
which uses fighting as a frame for what it does
including story
Yes, and it is a valid way to present it
if the challenge mode was somehow significantly different than what was previously used, I can consider the challenge mode a sequel to previous challenge modes, if we are to take modes as individual components of the game.
same goes for story
I am willing to agree the fighting mode of the game is more or less an enhanced edition of smash 4 if that makes you happy
yes max
it is significantly different to smash 4
yes max, it is a mode
okay, and?
why does that matter
because it is a story mode
thus a difference in story is crucial for the story mode to be considered not a port of previous smash story modes
the story mode of smash ultimate is a massive change to the story mode of smash 4 max
yes
in that it actually exists
for starters
Again, and?
And the story of fe 7 and fe8 function the same way, to justify getting back to the turn based stratagy
it is almost like a game frames it story in the game mechanic
that is not what we are arguing
