its wrong is subtle ways 75% of the time
politics
Friday, June 26, 2026
The level of protectionism we're going to see to protect intellectual/white-collar jobs
is going to make gas station attendents out of all of us
The plus on AI is, the race for infinite profits might kill IP laws and copyright
which is the correct thing to happen
I forget about if I posted it here or not
the plan has already been laid for that
which I think is genius
the US sovreign wealth fund idea
where, because some huge portion of these companies will be made "publicly owned", that they have a right to all public works
OpenAI/Antropic/xAI/Google/Facebook/Apple/etc are in favor of it because it protects them from the copyright bogyman
and Trump, Republicans, Democrats, and the far-Left are all in favor of it because it's one big bribe
I'm sure Nick Fuentes, Thomas Massie, and The Pope are going to be against it for some reason
Alright I finished reading spooky's article, that was a long one lmao
At least 40% of the length was artistic liberties the author took in writing it, but overall, I think it was fairly reasonable for most of the points
I like all the random schitzo lore they drop about themselves as it goes too
Yeah, his writing seems like he's dumping his thoughts onto text and not reformatting it into coherent reading. Random interjections and such.
I'll be honest, I kept clicking footnotes and thought that the introduction was the entire article and below it was comments, so I'll hold my peace on it til I finish lol. I just agree with Tiny, it feels like this is a transcript to a briefing.
I had no idea who they were before
Replying to Kribbles #kribbles1 Yeah, his writing seems like he's dumping his thoughts onto text and not reformatting it into coherent reading. Random interjections and such. I'll be honest, I kept clicking footnotes and thought that the introduction was the entire article and below it was comments, so I'll hold my peace on it til I finish lol. I just agree with Tiny, it feels like this is a transcript to a briefing.
It does sorta read like a podcast transcript
granted, one where the host isn't grifting dick pills or trying to fill dead air by restating the same thing on-repeat
I like the use of Em-dashes, because I think half the people who are anti AI will see them and get mad
Kribbles, your document was more skitzo than this
I had such a hard time reading what I did of it lmao
It was also the third gayest thing you ever sent me
sent/said to
Replying to Phijkchu_Pikachu #klombak It was also the third gayest thing you ever sent me
fuck you I haven't even sent any gay shit to you
I think I also had whiplash when I read this earlier today, because right before it I was reading a take from the spurned college fling of the Anthropic CEO (who herself was an old-school PHD in machine learning and AI), saying that even if he is able to cure her cancer with AI she'll turn him down. And you could hear the reddit applause in her head as she wrote that
I think machine learning is really cool and awesome actually!
I will have to see if my EMT buddy was sent
(not Mini)
10 seconds on Facebook, yes he definitely was lmao
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Sunday, June 28, 2026
There was a time a few years ago, when if I was told my dollar store purchase was $1.58, I too might have gunned down Vinny
at least the story has a happy ending
Most of the good ones infact
(Canada is 90 days no visa)
Monday, June 29, 2026
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Huge news guys, I read the bill text
1) this applies only to sites that are 33%+ porn
2) Explicitly states the credit card verification (or similar) is sufficient
Replying to legorhin #jazardly requiring a registered credit card is a perfectly fine way of age verification
This would not work for me...
It's not, because grifters
The CC method imo is my actual preferred implementation, because it's broadly effective where it needs to be, but can be circumvented by parents if desired
Sites can also verify the users age in any way they want, other than "(2) Provide that a user confirming that the user is not a minor is not sufficient to verify age."
it also fucks over advertisers, which I think is a win
I like that
the 2nd part to the bill I'm also broadly in-favor of
for non-porn sites, if you don't age-gate your site, you have a bunch of requirements to protect kids
I think as long as they action reports in a timely manner