Archive details

Discord archive

Neon Genesis Phijkchu

Lifecycle
July 17, 2020 – Present
Snapshot
Through August 30, 2026
Preserved messages
June 19, 2020 – August 30, 2026
Members
712
Messages
1,098,506
Channels
43

Archive navigation

politics

Jump to date
Pins
PhrogDor politics
State dept should also put on notice of an empire shitting the bed hard. Don't be american abroad bc lots of people have vendettas against our gov they'll take out on us
Garbage politics
Professional cornhole player, quadruple amputee faces murder charge...

A professional cornhole player who’s also a quadruple amputee is facing murder charges after a deadly shooting in Charles County, Maryland, over the weekend. Dayton James Webber, 27, was behind the wheel of a car in La Plata when he allegedly shot and killed a friend during an argument Sunday night before dumping the victim’s body and fleein...

www.nbcwashington.com
Spooky Phijkchu politics
it has implications beyond that too, but explicitly rules in favor that ISPs are not liable for whatever the fuck you do as an end customer, and are not expected to provide private customer data to 3rd parties
TinyBomby politics
Feels kinda crazy that Sony would push this so far since this loss is really bad for them. I feel like keeping it on the previous status quo would've been better for them.
TinyBomby politics
I do wonder if this will actually change anything though. Like, will ISPs no longer actively care at all about piracy since it's been ruled that they cannot be sued for it? Or will it continue as is with no changes because they still want to curb piracy, just not be sued for failure.
TinyBomby politics
The majority’s decision thus permits ISPs to sell an internet connection to every single infringer who wants one without fear of liability and without lifting a finger to prevent infringement. It also means that Cox is free to abandon its current policy of responding to copyright infringement. As Cox’s counsel conceded at oral argument, under the rule the majority adopts today, the safe harbor provision will not “d[o] anything at all” going forward, id., at
Dialga politics
Replying to TinyBomby #tinybomby
The majority’s decision thus permits ISPs to sell an internet connection to every single infringer who wants one without fear of liability and without lifting a finger to prevent infringement. It also means that Cox is free to abandon its current policy of responding to copyright infringement. As Cox’s counsel conceded at oral argument, under the rule the majority adopts today, the safe harbor provision will not “d[o] anything at all” going forward, id., at
so yeah basically if they want to just not do anything about people breaking copyright, they're allowed to do nothing
TinyBomby politics
Replying to Dialga #god_of_time
so yeah basically if they want to just not do anything about people breaking copyright, they're allowed to do nothing
As I said, it's possible this changes nothing, but it also means that the ISPs could just stop everything because it no longer has any profit incentive. Like, purely monetarily, they don't want to cancel pirates because that's just money lost.
Dialga politics
i dont see why they wouldnt stop, they dont have to pay people to look for or into infringement cases, and selling out your customers to Copywright lawyers means that customer will probably stop paying you for your services

This archive is read-only — snapshot through August 30, 2026

Channels:
Density:

Jump to date

Local bookmark

Choose a color

This marker stays in this browser. Your choice becomes the default for the next bookmark.