politics
Jump to date
Friday, June 28, 2024
rumour two is gavin newsom, but that would also be awful. honestly based on recent press releases from jill and obama I think the current plan is really to run Biden again. unless he dies or they pivot down the road the pivot down the road, which as the hours pass keeps looking more possible. if the dems were thinking of swapping him they would have held back on affirming him further after the debate and up until now
Undecided voters say they now support Joe Biden after debate
A group of undecided Latino voters said they would support President Joe Biden over former President Donald Trump.
www.newsweek.comSaturday, June 29, 2024
Sunday, June 30, 2024
It’s fucking crazy that who is the better golfer is being argued about at a presidential debate
Leading Report (@LeadingReport) on X
BREAKING: The decision has been made that Biden will not seek reelection, according to Bill O’Reilly. O’Reilly says the White House doesn't yet know how or when to make the announcement.
twitter.comThis is not news
but they attached O'Reilly's name to it now
If it's not real, it's probably being pushed by Gretchen Whitmer (MI Governor)
who has been trying to fundraise off of this to raise her profile
Monday, July 1, 2024
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131
Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) on X
The ones I feel sorry for are my administrative law colleagues who built their courses and careers around the intricacies of Chevron deference.
twitter.comI feel like Chevron deference was the only thing that made the government seem like it was sorta working
most of the bad 3-letter orgs will continue to do their thing regardless (ATF overstepping will not change based on this imo)
But the rest are going to be absolutely neutered, as they now need to wait for congress
which is good, but our system is so fucked that I think simple things are going to break
I just don't think that first part is going to happen, regardless of the next election it's another 4 years of deadlock at minimum
I don't think deadlock is always bad mind you, but I'd say rn there's probably a need for more policy than we've been getting
Greg Price (@greg_price11) on X
🚨🚨BREAKING: The Supreme Court has sided with President Trump, ruling that presidents cannot be held criminally liable for official actions of government and delivering a nuke to Jack Smith’s January 6 indictment. 6-3 decision
twitter.comweird timing to release this
Drastically increase the number of seats in congress (by setting a population cap on each district)
would drive down campaign spending and reduce the celebrity factor of being in congress
I go back and forth on term limits for the Senate, Age limits in general as well I can go either way on
Virginia does a sequential term limit on Governors, which would be similar to limiting the Senate to 1, 6-year term
I mean, they'd just expand it to a multi-floor chamber, like every other legislature has
I think even with term limits, it's hard to break up the upper legislature class in the Senate
They are all going to be political careerists, no matter what you do, and I think preventing them from overt insider trading and corruption is disconnected from term limits mostly
List of legislatures by number of members
This is a list of legislatures by number of members. Non-sovereign entities and unrecognized states are marked in italics.
en.wikipedia.orgI recognize that things break down with the numbers we're looking at
but 1 congressman for ~750k people
seems kind of misaligned
I'd say 1000 to have a nice even number
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/435-representatives/
What If The House Of Representatives Had More Than 435 Seats?
See how adding more seats to the U.S. House makes Congress more representative
projects.fivethirtyeight.comwhatever number we pick is arbitrary, I'd rather cap district size
"a person should at most represent XXX people"
any improvement is good though, so yeah even if we just doubled 435
George Washington and James Madison proposed an amendment to the constitution that would have capped it at 1 : 50,000
But only 10/13 states ratified it
so it was 1 short
Congressional Apportionment Amendment
The Congressional Apportionment Amendment (originally titled Article the First) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that addresses the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It was proposed by Congress on September 25, 1789, but was never ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures. As Congress did not ...
en.wikipedia.org50k would have probably risen over time, but I kind of suspect it would have settled around 100k
that guy who got the 27th amendment added (which was tabled alongside this one) considered it
List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States
Thirty-three amendments to the Constitution of the United States have been proposed by the United States Congress and sent to the states for ratification since the Constitution was put into operation on March 4, 1789. Twenty-seven of those, having been ratified by the requisite number of states, are part of the Constitution. The first ten amendm...
en.wikipedia.orgI didn't realize there were 6 of these
rest are later adds to the partially ratified list
