lfg

a remake usually shares like no assets

lol

I think there needs to exist something when discussing sequels, that's between a roster update (like sports games get) and a true sequel

I don't think ultimate is a remake either for the record

good

I can see Mario 64 DS as a remake due to that its entirely different with the textures and etc. being new assets maybe

sort of

maybe

but ultimate, almost all the characters are just ported over from wii u

I still consider 64 to be a port

I also agree spooky that there needs to be an inbetween for roster update and true sequel, I just disagree with where you two are drawing the limit

i think i would not count it as a port if everything was newer

but its too much like an "enhanced port"

plus, thats nintendo's design model

if smash ultimate was just new characters than 100% I would agree it was a port

they do it ALL THE TIME

where do you draw the line then pika

is bowsers inside for 3ds a port

since it has a new mode

I would not know

I have not played it or the origonal

is the new mode important

It's a second campaign, like DLC in a lot of ways

so its if it is important to you?

yes, do note that everyone here is being subjective

including me

so

if smash didnt add a mode that was "important" to you

it would be a port

if smash did not have a new single player, I would be more willing to accept it as a port

yes

because singleplayer is a major part of the game

as it is packaged

not for smash

Pika

yes for smash

yes it is

its not a "selling point"

Did you not look at the site

FFS

no its not

look at the fucking site

I did spooky

it's 100% a selling point

Nintendo markets shit strangely all the time

That's such a cop-out

but it's true spooky

Nintendo is marketing the game based on the new additions

The extra modes are just window dressing for the meat of the game