I don't think ultimate is a remake either for the record
lfg
<:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> E3 cancelled, E4 is in.
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
I still consider 64 to be a port
I also agree spooky that there needs to be an inbetween for roster update and true sequel, I just disagree with where you two are drawing the limit
if smash ultimate was just new characters than 100% I would agree it was a port
I would not know
I have not played it or the origonal
is the new mode important
It's a second campaign, like DLC in a lot of ways
yes, do note that everyone here is being subjective
including me
if smash did not have a new single player, I would be more willing to accept it as a port
yes
because singleplayer is a major part of the game
as it is packaged
Pika
yes for smash
yes it is
Did you not look at the site
FFS
I did spooky
it's 100% a selling point
Nintendo markets shit strangely all the time
That's such a cop-out
but it's true spooky
Nintendo is marketing the game based on the new additions
The extra modes are just window dressing for the meat of the game
yeah, I guess, then I disagree with how nintendo is marketing the game
And for the record
https://www.smashbros.com/en_US/howtoplay/technique.html
These are the mechanical changes they highlight
it is a selling point, just not the main selling point
if mario kart hd had sufficiently new content I would be willing to not consider it a port yes
Then I would consider it more of a remaster
Let me use an example of what a port is max. The Hyperdimension neptunia games were PORTED to PC with the only change being including the DLC for free. otherwise the games are the exact same
story mode can be sufficiently new content
Pika, this is kind of funny
This is the only place they mention the campaign on their site
lmao
that is funny
again max, how enhanced is a port before it is a remake