Archive details

Discord archive

Neon Genesis Phijkchu

Lifecycle
July 17, 2020 – Present
Snapshot
Through August 30, 2026
Preserved messages
June 19, 2020 – August 30, 2026
Members
712
Messages
1,098,506
Channels
43

Archive navigation

rawb

Jump to date
Pins
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
Sorry for the weird site downtime, my primary UPS "died" and even though there's a second one in series there was no way to stop the primary from beeping constantly without physically disconnecting it
mtcdood rawb
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131
I'm also genuinely curious if they are just going to take and develop our land
It's not your land if the government can take it away from you over a few thousand dollar tax bill.
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think the majority being 1 tier above me, who is mostly anti AI out of personal gripes and thinking that humanity itself is fucking itself over by how it came about being implemented, makes sense
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
I think your tier and even the tier 1 above you are both sort of the position that AI is not going to improve much further from where it is now, that we're 80-90% of the way to maxing out its potential
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
LLMs are they are now, we are hitting what we are going to get, we are not going to get any more 100x quality jumps like we did, until another breakthrough that is transformer tier, is figured out
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
Replying to Phijkchu_Pikachu #klombak
I think the vast majority of people think LLMs are either somwhat useful at niche topics, or maybe very useful in general, but nothing more than that
I think the general population is aligned mostly with Leg, probably skewing a bit towards "fun novelty"
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
Replying to Phijkchu_Pikachu #klombak
LLMs are they are now, we are hitting what we are going to get, we are not going to get any more 100x quality jumps like we did, until another breakthrough that is transformer tier, is figured out
I firmly disagree with this now, but that was my opinion for a long time, that LLMs were probably a dead end to getting to AGI or beyond
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
I don't think that LLMs are as rigid a construct as I initially thought the initial approach to training felt self-limiting, and I would have been the first person to tell you it was going to hit a wall and our fun markov chain toys were going to all be forgotten about
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think the limit is, a LLM cannot freely think beyond its data set. I think you might be able to get higher results using multiple LLMs in parallel doing different things
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
maybe a function without distinction, but I do not support the idea of claiming what we have now is more than it is, a tool that ranges from not to very useful depending on what you use it for
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think when a LLM can update its own training data in reasonable time, without human intervention, and without imploding itself, I will consider us closer to your view
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think it can improve, but I think the cost to improve it is getting higher for lower returns, and the only reason you have not seen it slow down is instead of letting it slow down they are just burning trillions to get these diminishing returns

This archive is read-only — snapshot through August 30, 2026

Channels:
Density:

Jump to date

Local bookmark

Choose a color

This marker stays in this browser. Your choice becomes the default for the next bookmark.