Archive details

Discord archive

Neon Genesis Phijkchu

Lifecycle
July 17, 2020 – Present
Snapshot
Through August 30, 2026
Preserved messages
June 19, 2020 – August 30, 2026
Members
712
Messages
1,098,506
Channels
43

Archive navigation

rawb

Jump to date
Pins
mtcdood rawb
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131
bandwidth realistically is free up until the point of abuse, and everything up until actual DDOSing should be fine
It's free if you own all the hardware involved and are big enough to get fee-free peering. If you're paying some middleman for a port or for transit per Mbit it's very expensive.
mtcdood rawb
Once one of those big companies that don't have to pay these fees decide "I could make some money off this free resource" everyone downstream gets punished.
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
I'm more saying fundamentally the reason peering is for-profit at all is because early providers wanted to be paid be governments for owning the infrastructure, there's no real cost at the BGP layer why a cost is incurred, even when transiting networks/ISPs/countries
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
I think my point is sort of that, we've decided that these free things cost money, so that companies can make money but when you scale that up and start talking about services like Twitch, which will have millions of simultaneous open connections with outbound data
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
Replying to mtcdood #mtcdood
Once one of those big companies that don't have to pay these fees decide "I could make some money off this free resource" everyone downstream gets punished.
I do agree with this to a point though, if you suddenly made bandwidth free odds are you'd have Network abuse, even if I can't predict the exact form it would take
TinyBomby rawb
I think it's variable, which is obviously the hardest to implement. If he's like, "blah blah blah...... um..... blah blach" then that um feels like it should be there, but if he says, "I've been doing a lot of, um, this and that" then I think it should be left out
Phijkchu_Cynnydaquil rawb
I think a 1 to 1 transcription even if there's a lot of um's and uh's is better, because in my mind the transcription is for having written what was said, so having that makes the most sense to me
Civ rawb
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131
Polar, I'm not shilling when I say this I really don't think many people appreciate how overpowered AI are at coding now
my company has an internal version of ChatGPT and i gotta be honest its terrible. i know the latest gemini and Claude are much better than GPT 5, but Ill boil my problems down to the most leetcode-y type problem i can and at best take like a quarter of its code and do the rest my self.
Spooky Phijkchu rawb
I've been generally pretty impressed at the coding up-tick since the last major models released in October/November they're not better than people who know the codebase and work in it every day or anything
Civ rawb
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131
I've been generally pretty impressed at the coding up-tick since the last major models released in October/November they're not better than people who know the codebase and work in it every day or anything
i basically only ask it questions on writing efficent pandas dataframe manipulations. it doesnt know shit about lesser-known librarys even when i include the docs in the prompt

This archive is read-only — snapshot through August 30, 2026

Channels:
Density:

Jump to date

Local bookmark

Choose a color

This marker stays in this browser. Your choice becomes the default for the next bookmark.