politics
Monday, August 5, 2024
haven't watched yet but also came out today
https://vxtwitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1820505150244413449
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 Click to see original message
You were right Spooky
Judge Mehta found that Google doesn’t have a monopoly in the market for general search advertising, noting that competitors like Amazon.com Inc., Walmart Inc. and other retailers have begun to offer advertising related to searches on their own websites. But Google does have a monopoly over search text ads, which appear at the top of a search results page to draw users to websites, he said.
That's the basis of the ruling
it's kind of interesting, basically that because Google has this monopoly, they cannot pay Apple/Samsung billions of dollars to make their search engine the default, because that would be horizontally integrating themselves
I personally do not think that they will do anything radical to Google, it will likely be a large fine and a requirement to be extra conciliatory when it comes to ads
There's a bigger case next month that they'll probably win, but if somehow they don't they would most likely get broken up
please break up every megacorp
please let this be the actual thing that happens among all the nothing that ever happens
into GoogleAds, GoogleWebServices, and GoogleMobile/Android
that next case is literally a joke
that they have a monopoly because they are the only company able to use technology to acomplish providing their core services
i.e., you cannot go to Walmart, and buy your own YouTube (actual court example)
lmfao
I mean, I think there is a possible legal arguement that they have a defacto monopoly because the things they do are prohibitively expensive to make real competition
but thats a retarded way to phrase that idea
it would be a crazy precedent to set
tbh, I go back and forth on breaking companies up
as much as I hate certain companies, there's never been a successful government forced merger/breakup,
it either achieves nothing or massively handicaps entire industries
I think the thing that needs to be done is just force them to do things that they are free to refuse to do sometimes
what things depends on what company
I'd be more in favor with the government being able to unilaterally oust the board of directors, and run the corporation directly for a period of 5 years
if it's between that and a forced breakup
hear me out spooky
if corperations are people, the government needs to mandate they can forcfully divorce two people
that is the in
perfect
sure, US debt is not 100 trillion
thats what you'd need for that fund Dialga
it is prohibitively expensive
Replying to Dialga #god_of_time instead of trying to punish google directly(which wont happen), would it be effective to fund/provide benefits for start-ups in markets that are obviously dominated by 1 or 2 major entities like Google/Amazon without much or any effective competition?
No
also the competition to google in a lot of fields is just outright worse
people will not go to a worse product just to stick it to google
tbh, I find the reddit-tier arguments that "all competition is good" to be annoying
if someone can do something better, they will and they will be successful or they will bring change to established companies
Steam does not need any competition, they are a good company as is
google could use some, but only because it is a shitty company
monopolies are bad when you (actually) have no choice, like electricity, which is when they get regulated
Google is a better product still, despite being enshitified a ton over the last 5+ years
chromium is still just outright better than firefox and any other browsers I have seen
if Google was actively restricting access to the web, I could see them getting the book thrown at them
but they're not