general

...I don't even remember where this meme came from, come to think of it.

you mean the movie?

No, the "Arbiter of Truth, tell me more" meme

oh

i was gonna say

Halo 2

how could you not know the movie

Besides the meme, all I find when googling the quote is a comment on an image from the Assigned Male webcomic on KnowYourMeme.

happy 61

What the fuck does that mean lamp

Also hello lamp

The server is currently named "Phijkchu celebrates 61," so I'd infer it has something to do with that. Just a guess.

oh lol

pika outmanuevered by dunceparse

crushing defeat

Pika's not exactly known for his maneuverability

What was the name for the clownfish drug in lords of minecraft?

swammies

ahh that's right

the guy in my dnd game just talked about the local drug "sweed" and i was like hmmm that's familiar

and why is my name travis espinoza

Amougus

Sweed is certainly a choice for a drug name

wait, I think adding an 'S' might actually work for all drugs

Smeth, sheroin, scrack

swirate

samongus

sijkchu

susp

Ssalvia

...nevermind.

happy 100 day snapchat streak @Mini

polu wat

how are we so far behind

what happened

wait did I kill our streak at some point

regi get snapchat, I swear I always have things I want to snap ya

ugh, zoomers

Regi don't

90% of Mint's snaps are of the adjacent urinal

spooky lies, he knows not of my snaps

lmao

Huh

I have snapchat but i never use jt

Uhc time

@Lute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtPQQm0HZIQ

cringe

dnd is cringe

I only found out just recently how cringe D&D has become

You like how all the monster race descriptions make sure to point out that they’re actually very nuanced and there’s plenty of good people in their ranks, but then gives no new lore to back it up

That was apparently supposed to be remedied in "Mordenkainen's Monsters of the Multiverse," but I guess it just restated what you said in more words.

WotC also puts this shit on the page for all PDF and print-on-demand orders for anything produced by TSR: We (Wizards) recognize that some of the legacy content available on this website does not reflect the values of the Dungeons & Dragons franchise today. Some older content may reflect ethnic, racial, and gender prejudice that were commonplace in American society at that time. These depictions were wrong then and are wrong today. This content is presented as it was originally created, because to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices never existed. Dungeons & Dragons teaches that diversity is a strength, and we strive to make our D&D products as welcoming and inclusive as possible. This part of our work will never end.

If it was wrong then, why was it published, mass produced, mass distributed? If it was culturally offensive, why do the AD&D 1e books straight up say "These races aren't all necessarily 100% evil; they're evil in the MONSTER MANUAL because they're MONSTERS, not PLAYER RACES?"

D&D and RPGs is, like, one of very few places in the 70s/80s where anyone of any identity would be welcome, as long as you're a nerd, because all of society excludes you because you're a fucking nerd.

Well even then, something like an illithid isn’t evil for evil’s sake, it literally has to eat people to reproduce

It has to eat people to reproduce, but it doesn't have to enslave the gith. I think that's more why they're listed as "evil."

This is kind of a fault of the alignment system as a whole, but evil doesn’t have to mean malicious

That's not really what it is. It's more so that WotC D&D hasn't explicitly said "law, chaos, good, and evil are not wholly your morality; these are objective forces of nature imposed by supreme beings" like AD&D does.