let's just have a law "no bad driving"... but how do we judge bad driving... how about when they violate road markings or harm others
general
Jump to date
Friday, December 18, 2020
Or, and hear me out, knowingly choosing to do something that you know will increase risks while having no reason why you need to do said thing
is a crime
should I be able to eat lunch while driving Pika
called reckless endagerment
Depends spooky
are you eating soup?
let's say I drove through Chick-fil-A, and am dipping my nuggets in sauce packets
then no
fuck that
like I said, Pika doesn't drive
you have a bagel already out next to you that you can grab, okay
you have a multi step food
also using nugget sauce is bad anyways
just eat the nuggets
this is my point though Pika, you've essentially created a law that says "people have to behave inhumanly in order to do this thing that humans do"
I don't mean that in the meme way it sounds
dipping nuggets in sauce is the human condition
Umbreon
you know what I actually do a lot
Eyes on the road retard
is clap along to the music while driving
which is probably 1,000 more dangerous than anything else
Spooky has to look down to see if the loli is still doing her job under his seat
Spooky why do you not tap the steering wheel
why do you clap
thats autistic
because I drive with my knees most of the time
so I can lean back
Spooky is driving in a lying down seat
with his feet
if you're obeying the signs
it's doing no harm to anyone
what if you do Dolf?
I obeyed the signs, but I rear ended the guy in front of me because I was distracted
not a crime
I obeyed the signs
and we're back to semantics
look, I get that you don't drive, and "cars are scary" and whatnot
What about the people here who do drive and agree with me
this is a bullshit arguement
