general

that is effectively how I am defining it

in this circumstance

Public nudity should be illegal, yes

^

driving drunk and using your phone is an action you knowingly take, which is commonly known to be dangerous, and you have no reason to do them

I have no problem with you doing whatever the fuck you want in your car while driving, so long as you behave in a non-erratic way

so as far as I am concerned, it is reckless

drop the "recklessly" language alltogether

No.

Okay, I disagree.

which is why an hour ago, I said we disagree fundemantally

Things that lower reaction time are provably dangerous

and minimizing unnecessary actions that lower reaction time is fine

I don't care about that, all I care about is whether or not the blue kia 100ft in front of me is going to randomly switch lanes or blow through the next light

You see judge my definition of reckless was different from every legal document I’m sorry

Can’t convict me now

Don't get drunk if you don't have a place to stay the night

Uber

Do you care about the car behind you having a 3 second delay in recation time

Get kidnapped

so when the retard in front of you slams on the brakes, and you do

he rear ends you

so then he's liable for rear ending me?

I don't see the issue

Okay, you are now dead

he rear ended you and you hit your head

Ignore all trends and statistics

then he's liable for 2nd degree murder

or whatever

could have stopped it premptively

fuck that

"Arrest black people AFTER they commit crimes"

preemptive legislating

Get a load of this guy

is cancer

let's just lock up all black people, because they commit more crimes statistically

Ok

So

What if

fuck it, let's just keep the lockdown going forever, in case people get hurt in the outside world

I think we finally found an issue where I agree with gent and not you when it comes to libertarianism spooky

this is an interesting case study

Lockdown the border, not your houses

because 95% of the time it is you and I yelling at gent

and I think the fact you don't drive means your opinion is illinformed

Ok so I’m at a gun range and I shoot a bullet and I didn’t see that a guy was down range for some reason

I do not want to be rear ended by a drunk while I am in a car

I would get charged with endangerment or something right

sorry spooky

but why does being drunk matter?

And because I don't drink I'm illinformed, right?

or something to that effect*

Reaction time

what if he's ANGRY, and is distracted

is probably lower

Bet pika wouldn't want his bus driver drunk

and he has no reason why he needs to be drunk to drive

so again, we're back to "Pika hates alcohol"

I get it, easy to demonize

replace alcohol with literally anything

that reduces reaction time

Hate all drugs

18th shouldn’t have been repealed

that you do not need to use to operate a car

Best amendment

phone, drugs, wearing 3d glasses

lmao

3d glasses

let's just have a law "no bad driving"... but how do we judge bad driving... how about when they violate road markings or harm others

It's impractical to ban alcohol

Or, and hear me out, knowingly choosing to do something that you know will increase risks while having no reason why you need to do said thing

is a crime

should I be able to eat lunch while driving Pika

called reckless endagerment

Depends spooky

are you eating soup?

no

let's say I drove through Chick-fil-A, and am dipping my nuggets in sauce packets

then no

you guys dont eat 4 course meals while driving?