Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 Honestly, Linux is about being fun at this point to me, I'd never use it as a main device (same with a Mac) but there's something pure and soulful of seeing different fundamental concepts
por que no los dos
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 Honestly, Linux is about being fun at this point to me, I'd never use it as a main device (same with a Mac) but there's something pure and soulful of seeing different fundamental concepts
Replying to Kribbles #kribbles1 I do have a friend who would like to join if possible, but it'd only be Friday and Saturday nights. He was my hiking buddy where we both went to the 4chan party last year. I forgot to ask but also know it's kinda weird to invite a rando, so make of it what you will.
Gemini allegedly called man its "husband," said they could be together in death.
arstechnica.comReplying to Pyrrhic #swiss_army_cheese Since I'm subscribed to r/conspiracy and they never shut up about Jeffrey Epstein there. I've come to realise that he was a very handsome man. Like if he weren't so famous I could easily see his head being used instead for the gigachad meme.
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 even if I think its not that bad to actually do
We present an unconditional proof that non-trivial zeros of the Riemann Zeta function must lie strictly on the critical line $\text{Re}(s) = 0.5$. By defining a recursive path of Taylor expansions originating from the domain of absolute convergence, we translate the zeta function towards the critical region, which is an easy-to-understand form o...
arxiv.org@mathNTb The paper does not prove the Riemann Hypothesis. The chained Taylor construction gives a valid (if cumbersome) local representation, the symmetry appendices are correct, and several technical steps (base recursion, difference necessity) hold. However, the claimed contradiction in