Replying to (Not Spooky) Spark Dragon #sparkdragoon Well a sandwhich doesn’t recluse perfectly either
what
general
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
a sandwhich by design can't
because it needs to be seperable in a reversible manner
Yea and I can separate the hot dog and the bread and reverse it with the same damage that taking a piece of bread off a sandwhich and reapplying it
Have you ever seen a corndog
you literally cannot do this
I’m telling you I have had a corn dog that the entire breading fell off in one piece from the hot dog
how do you take it off without tearing the breading
Replying to (Not Spooky) Spark Dragon #sparkdragoon I’m telling you I have had a corn dog that the entire breading fell off in one piece from the hot dog
that is an improperly made corndog
The bottom might be a little damage but you can still put it back on the stick
you can't re-attach the breading to the meat though
Also what Lilina said
you cannot readhear the breading to the meat
I'm so lost
The sandwhich breading isn’t attached to the meat on an sandwhich
Rusp, do not lie you missed the endless sandwhich debates
I am just bringing back classic phijkchu
I like soup debates more
Replying to (Not Spooky) Spark Dragon #sparkdragoon The sandwhich breading isn’t attached to the meat on an sandwhich
It does not need to be
because thats not the point
the point is, you have to destroy a fundamental aspect of what a corndog is to remove the container, you do not need to do that to a sandwich
I think to be a sandwich OR a wrap, you need to have the bread be around the filling. Fries have filling around bread.
chilli cheese fries are a wrap, that is correct
My definition does not require bread
Is buttered toast a wrap now too?
you need only something and a container
buttered toast is a wrap
Then is those pootin fries also a wrap?
This is an insane development, folks
I agree
You have no idea how far we took this hypothetical before I used this current definition
Time to hop in Boice chat and debate till 2am folks
I disagree with old Pika, I like my current definition better
So then chocolate chip pancakes are a wrap?
Insanity
the pancake is the wrap for the chocolate chips in this case
Someone deport this man
Wait if the pancake is a wrap then a corn dog is a wrap too
Hot pockets are objectively wraps, that's not even in debate
this was true with both my old definition and my new definition
Replying to (Not Spooky) Spark Dragon #sparkdragoon Wait if the pancake is a wrap then a corn dog is a wrap too
yes
Then a wrap is a sandwhich
corndogs are not sandwiches
so your arguement fails
BUT WRAPS ARE SANDWHICHES
whoa whoa whoa
also, from a math perspective, for wrap = sandwich you need for any A in wrap, A is in sandwich and also for any A in sandwich, A is in wrap
If a=b and b=c then a=c
one counter examble does not prove equality of sets
Then how about waffles?
waffles are bread, they are a singular
Are they sandwiches or wraps if I add chocolate chips
if you add chocolate chips, wraps
otherwise, I guess my current definition allows for a third set, base ingredients
Now if you have two waffles with something between them, that's a sandwich
Lilina gets it
Then how is the grilled cheese press make them wraps and not sandhwiches
I've started to understand the mind of pika. This may be detrimental for my mental sanity later.
because it closes the bread togehter
in a way that you ruin the grilled cheese you made if you remove it
thus it is irreversible
No it doesn’t if I manually press the bread I can still break the bread apart
and hence, a wrap
yeah, but if it is fused because of the press
you cannot unfuse it reversibly
Replying to (Not Spooky) Spark Dragon #sparkdragoon No it doesn’t if I manually press the bread I can still break the bread apart
you break it though. Breaking something is not reversible.