games

and dota is full of sucidial third worlders

so the seocnd a game goes bad they just give up

no surrender is to prevent that

I STRONGLY think surrendering is a viable decision

the issue is that you still gert third worlders that go

OHH I LOST LANEEEE

IM GOING TO GO FARM TOP JUNGLE FOR 40 MINS

and just not ever play

if surrender existed, youd get 10x more of that

Max, you have to understand

I just leave

and eat the leavers queue

ik they changed that to be more gay now

well spooky

but I will not play out a lost game

having -1 point under default

behavior score

makes it so you cant chat

I get chat muted for calling people niggers anyway

i believe every game of dota is winnable, but your team has to want to play

I don't

at all

sorry

well extrapolated

let me rephrase

it's not

if they have a cracked

super stomping mid /carry

then yeah its not sure

but people give up WAY too early

just beause they lost lane

when 2/3 lanes are going strong

if you're losing because they're better at you, and have a better team comp

or the enemy has a strong early but bad late

but they're not pushing your shit in

the games drag on for 40-ish minutes

when they're over by 10

yes if its that bad then i undeerstand

but then you end up witht he league mentality

where every league player gives up like instantly

and never tries to comeback

theyre all cucks

and if its not a stomp

theyd ont play

which is gay

I haven't played league in forever ever

but I felt like surrenders were justified like 75-80% of the time

and I didn't mind the enemy team surrendering

when we're up 20-2

and the game is over