games

yes

while hteyre on the way to install it

but i dont like that you cant do like

sneaky ganks on their base

theyre doing everything to keep it 3v3

I just, can't imagine 3v3 being good

like basically everything about this

makes it for 3v3

i mean

100000000%

I disagree Max, and agree with forsen

they double back in a month

and make it more players

i was gonna say how long till they up team sizes

no spooky im saying they tried to do all they could

to make 3v3 work

low ttk, the fact you cant gank bases

3 is also a not conveinet amount of slots to play with friends imo

the quick respawn times

idk, the map being big feels at odds with that

theres like 5 loot locations probably

so youre going to end up fighting

like, I get that having one linear objective at a time that both sides fight over

well the first object for the first like

4 mins

is "loot"

then its "raid tool"

and if team a has the raid tool, team b will kill themselves on loop

to stop them installing it

and if they kill a, they try to insert the flag

This feels a LOT like Planetside and Tribes in how the maps and objectives work

ad streamers also kicked out lmao

like, A LOT A LOT

I'm curious to see it

this game would greatly benefit from fat team sizes, idk why they decided on 3v3 tight squad based stuff other than muh competitive game

i think with how its currently layed out, more than like 4 players would not work for this but I ALSO think that they did that on purpose and they could very easily change how this game works to make 5v5 work

If they couldn't make big teams work (for whatever reason) I sorta think 3v3 might have been the right move

push it as low as you can

like

imagine 5 people on horses

riding at mach 10 at you around you

especially with low TTK

what do you do

it also seems like it's snowbally, but won't feel like it

i dont think its snowbally at all

if you win a raid vs the enemy

they take damage

so every raid basically, the enemy is going to take damage too

yes that's what I mean

so you cant snowball

the losing team will always be winning engangements and not "feel" the slow loss

and will repel the better team multiple times

i dont think you can have a slow loss

because its

out of 100

and repelling does like 20 damage

er

25 damage

because it caps out at 4 raids per game

and having it do 25 damage

ensures that more than 4 raids cant happen

so if your base has 25 hp

so if you succeed in a raid, do you just win?

and you dont win the game with your raid

you lose instead

yes

a raid is a win

oh

everytime you raid someone you do 30 damage to them, and after you take 25 damage

but if you claim an objective in their base

you do 70 damage

it sounded like you could get some base dmg, even if you're repelled

or smthn

yes

thats what im saying

ok then, yeah

if you are A and you attack B B takes 30 damage

I feel like it's deceptively snowbally

if you do not FULLY KILL B and WIN THE GAME

you take 25 damage