general

Also Fire

would you use the chat on my site, if I let you just use Discord?

instead of making an account?

edym

i want to use the site chat

why would you use the chat when we just use discord

but everyone ends up taking here

discord is just better

Site chat would be so nice

I don't mind the site chat

discord needs

channel embedding

^

someone is re-writing the chat functionality, so we'll see what he comes up with

Discord needs to let you resize the window more

i guess if you're on phone its a bit of a hassle

also agree

what if we just watch spooky stream off his website on discord Kappa

i have an account spooky, i just wasn't logged in by default

ik Fire

I just think it would be funny to tie it to Discord

how would that make a difference if discord is shitting itself

Spooky are you talking like an o auth thing

yeah, one of the forks got this working

Yup

Yeah

What the heck are you forking

What is your site

What is delibird other then a pokemon

the core functionality, is an NginX-RTMP module from like 2016

which someone forked to create a embedable video stream

which a lot of people forked to create various template sites

Are you using any specific fork

one of which a competent dev formed to build a good framework for a database

which I forked to create this

make chat go across the video like niconico

it's my own fork

Leg

That would be pog

but then a lot of it's just stuff I've changed myself

Damn, the man's stuff is going up stream

I don't like commits in general

other than when someone wants to borrow easily sharable code

I don't like open sourced, outsourcing

Ope

where "we all contribute"

fuck that shit

I'll add on and change what you make, but don't expect a hundred people to work for you

There are some projects

where i swear the dev will get jealous of forks which don't share

and shut his own shit down

it's what i would do kappa4

Make your shit better then

rip smile fire

There was a really good github project, for a .flac streaming server / internet radio type thing

which had a dev through a hissy fit, over people making their own verions of the project

since 99% of github GUIs suck

Fork it then

Or let someone else fork and maintain it

github is terrible for that, despite that supposidly being their purpose

Fire, nooo, I liked that one

Yeah, not a huge github person

The github network view

is cancer

and worthless

I just use stuff other people make

Other then just using it to store config files

I'm using a 2018 version of Grocy I like, because it's become some amalgamation of random ideas the dev had

I think the culture of mantaining a fork is dumb

Then don't

I don't

I just am saying, I think forks are dumb

And if others decide it's worth it to maintain then they will

Idk

rename forks to sporks

It's better then just letting devs kill project

if I was in the shoes of some of these devs

I would delete my shit too

Ope