Anyways dolf, I only started posting about this here because I know a few other people started following this. I have been following this for about 8? months
general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Sunday, August 11, 2019
Pika, you're going to lose
you're going to have to wax his balls
it's his right
I would do it
he wants a Brazilian on his testicles
I will take one for the team
Careful what you offer Pika
now that you've made the service available
any of us can sue you
lol
Is it still up
or is that an old picture
rip
Does anyone have the draft for the new FTC/FCC EO?
it was leaked, but i can't find the text
internet media is PISSED, and as far as I can tell aren't referencing the actual text
This would amount to a sort of ‘Animal Farm’-style approach where all speech is freelmao
This is going to be a site to see, if they're this pissed right now
the remedies of treating Facebook, Google, Twitter and the like as monopolies or common carriers would worsen the problemPublic officials who respect the Constitution should not propose an entire regime to govern the InternetThe damage control is unreal
The only—legitimate and legal—restrictions on speech must flow from private not public actionit's not
this is a rebuke to the text of a proposal
that is too terrible to publish
so the media is just telling you it's bad
From what I can surmise, Trump wants the FTC/FCC to receive power to designate some private speech as public
as it regards to the internet, citing interstate commerce
which protects it from undue censorship
So if they designate non-protested Twitter feeds to be public speech
Twtter would not be able to refuse a persons ability to access said public forum (normal 1A exceptions)
they could likely still limit you in many ways if they wanted, but that will be governed by the FTC/FCC
Trump not being able to block people was a weird case, and as far as I can tell it's because Twitter has designated certain accounts currently to be "public officials"
no, but that was the argument the judge made
that as a public official, he was burdened differently
Trumps counterpoint was that he has 2 accounts
if it actually ever goes to trial we'd get interesting case law out of it
because there is a function of verifibility which needs to take place
Because I can set up a light switch to send out tweets every time it's turned on/off
and Trump should be fully within his right to block that
but I could either claim it was my speech, indirectly
or I could claim that it was not
no, you should be allowed to set up a bot that responds to every trump tweet with a gif of a man spreading his asshole and trump should have to see it Kappa
Part of the argument was also that these fucks make a living based on their placement in replies to Trump tweets
which they do
which is amusing
by being blocked ,it is a direct monetary setback
as gay as that is
the downside of all of this, is that I feel like sites will start rolling out more verification bullshit
unless; again, the government stops them from requiring SSN or ID
we kind of filled the porn channel with Fate talk
so pretty much anywhere but here
#yiffy-cumhole
for the real answer
#me-too is the actual porn channel
dump all of your degenerate fag shit there
bio that is why anal is degenerate
saw that
made me laugh
luckily I live in a slightly less insane country than the UK
and do not require one