still watches rob
general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Saturday, August 10, 2019
lmao
I should have never looked up in this chat
Transrights
whats not to like dialga
I guess Twitter was tired of Epstein trending
it's not in the top 50, all of a sudden
despite being top 5, 15 minutes ago
what a shocker
basically
Sunday, August 11, 2019
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Yaniv wikipedia purged and nuked the Yaniv article and its history
i love freedom
Canadian Tranny, who is at the center of 3 different scandals right now
johnathan yaniv is a pedophile who lives in british columbia. He is currently famous because he is using the BC human rights tribunals (think courts but more homosexual) on over a dozen women because they refused to wax his testicles
he is categorically insane
a less succinct way of saying what spooky said
This of Yaniv as a bellwether, for how bad Canada has gotten
Anyways dolf, I only started posting about this here because I know a few other people started following this. I have been following this for about 8? months
Pika, you're going to lose
you're going to have to wax his balls
it's his right
I would do it
he wants a Brazilian on his testicles
I will take one for the team
Careful what you offer Pika
now that you've made the service available
any of us can sue you
lol
Is it still up
or is that an old picture
rip
Does anyone have the draft for the new FTC/FCC EO?
it was leaked, but i can't find the text
internet media is PISSED, and as far as I can tell aren't referencing the actual text
This would amount to a sort of ‘Animal Farm’-style approach where all speech is freelmao
This is going to be a site to see, if they're this pissed right now
the remedies of treating Facebook, Google, Twitter and the like as monopolies or common carriers would worsen the problemPublic officials who respect the Constitution should not propose an entire regime to govern the InternetThe damage control is unreal
The only—legitimate and legal—restrictions on speech must flow from private not public actionit's not
this is a rebuke to the text of a proposal
that is too terrible to publish
so the media is just telling you it's bad
From what I can surmise, Trump wants the FTC/FCC to receive power to designate some private speech as public
as it regards to the internet, citing interstate commerce
which protects it from undue censorship
So if they designate non-protested Twitter feeds to be public speech
Twtter would not be able to refuse a persons ability to access said public forum (normal 1A exceptions)
they could likely still limit you in many ways if they wanted, but that will be governed by the FTC/FCC