And for the record
https://www.smashbros.com/en_US/howtoplay/technique.html
lfg
<:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> E3 cancelled, E4 is in.
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
These are the mechanical changes they highlight
it is a selling point, just not the main selling point
if mario kart hd had sufficiently new content I would be willing to not consider it a port yes
Then I would consider it more of a remaster
Let me use an example of what a port is max. The Hyperdimension neptunia games were PORTED to PC with the only change being including the DLC for free. otherwise the games are the exact same
story mode can be sufficiently new content
Pika, this is kind of funny
This is the only place they mention the campaign on their site
lmao
that is funny
again max, how enhanced is a port before it is a remake
and how do you know that smash ultimate doesn't have new code
so fe 7 and fe8 are the same game more or less minus a few tweaks
similar assets, similar code
"units are all different"
so the same minus they change some variables in the code
got it
I am just trying to gauge where exactly your limit for remake vs port falls
how about splatoon vs splatoon 2 as for sequel vs port vs remake
A remake is a REMAKING of the same game, with new assets or code, usually to fix things or make it look pretty.
A PORT is a game PORTED from one place to another, with little or few changes.
Nintendo does what spooky described as "Enhanced Ports" in which they PORT the game, but then add more content
I'd say splatoon 2 is a sequel
I would also I was just curious what max thought about it
assets not entirely new
weapons not entirely new
story yes
gameplay mostly the same
Pika, they changed all the weapons
At least, all their secondary fires
there are some carryovers
splatoon singleplayer was a selling point for me
and the main reason I bought 2
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'd say generally it's PvP game Pika
Story/salmon run are modes
I agree it is mostly a pvp game