lfg
<:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> <:Tea:612680029171875850> E3 cancelled, E4 is in.
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
Youtube wants me to watch this
no it is not
smash 4 was a port of smash 1 change my mind
what system was it on before
different game
it is a port
smash ultimate is not a remaster of smash 4
It's an "enhanced port" as Nintendo calls them
It's just enhanced to an insane degree
Mariokart 8 deluxe was the same game ported over
ultimate is as much of a port as brawl was a port of melee
Pika, do you not honestly see the difference between those two comparisons
so if something shares any small% of assets it is auto just a port
I consider a port to be something that keeps what a game is intact, smash ultimate is fundamentally different than smash 4
entire singleplayer changed, core game mechanics changed
t o t a l l y a p o r t
I disagree with that term
makes the term port meaningless
Pika, you can't point to a new game mode, as evidence it's not a port
And what mechanics have changed, the air dodge?
And then ruleset changes
Shmash ultimate is not a port
no, it isn't
Air dodge, shielding works differently, can't infinite ledgegrab now
to name a few
those are fairly major as far as how the game works
Those don't feel major though Pika, even for a fighting game
Look at the Smash website, for what they advertise
You can call it a port, then the term is just worthless
that's fine
enhanced sequel
is ff8 a port of ff7
I mean FE
ffs
karp
fuck off
Pika, what do they advertise as being different this time with Smash?
The fighters, stages, and music are just those in Smash 4, plus more
A lot more granted
the singleplayer is completely different
maybe it is because I don't give a shit about multiplayer and only ever care about singleplayer