lfg

but bopit is retarded

and youre making the same argument as him

that says something

Fates is bad because Nintendo didn't know what they wanted to do with the game Three games, the stupid town dailys, all the wireless shit, out of place children mechanics from Awakening

On top of not being particularly well written

spooky did you know

the writer didnt even want to write the story until he played a fire emblem game with his daughter or something

then wrote the entire story

I don't even know what he was going for with the story

It's just such a mess

Conquest, and Fates in general just are problem filled. From the start of development it was bad, two groups were formed, those who wanted "fan service galore" and those who didn't this hurt the game already by ideas being split. Then there's the author I mentioned before, who probably just wanted to "impress his daughter". The story is bad. It's convoluted, it doesn't flow, there's an egregious amount of plot holes, it's just bad. It doesn't stop there though, it didn't help how the localization fucked everything, swimsuits gone, petting gone, ENTIRE CONVERSATIONS REMOVED. Then comes the children. They don't need to exist other than just being there for no reason. The kids grow up in a fucking hyperbolic time chamber? Come on. It also ties in Awakening characters for NO REASON. Like they can't even come up with enough original characters on their own, some of the fucking kids are straight awakening rip-offs too.

I never said the story was good

I know

I'm just saying why fates is bad.

The best part about the children is they all come out of their time travel zone at random ages

^

I liked the gameplay, and that's why i liked the game

Often older than their parents

Gameplay isnt all there is to a game though

Especially a Fire Emblem game

no, but it's my main concern

thats why Pokemon Lets Go is doing so well in the reviews

FE gameplay is two parts though, maps and the combat system itself

I don't think the maps were that good

Fates screwed up the fucking weapon triangle

also makes me mad

the new triangle is cancer

?

There were some standouts, but most of them weren't great, and you played each map multiple times

triangle includes bows and daggers now

And shurikens

why is that bad?

because it ruins how the formula has always worked, and it makes no sense for some of the weapons

also ruins tomes

I don't think the new triangle is cancer, but I don't like how it seemingly nerfed all the secondary shit

and the swords/lance/axe intermingle with the bows/tomes

i hate it

bows and magic were interesting because they were neutral

ranged neutral

how does

holding a lance

make you strong against a magic attack

it should be the opposite

how does holding a lance make you weak to a bow

That's a dumb point Max, the triangle has always made little realistic sense

actually

It just makes less sense now

that sword/weapon guy on youtube

proved that most of it made sense

I watched that one

except axes sorta ehh

but hey, it worked

I can accept the old triangle a lot better, to your point

The new one is just gamey

#makeFEpokemon

there used to be a magic only triangle

which i enjoyed

which was light, dark and anima (elemental) magic

I don't know, it just feel like fates ruined a lot of fire emblem

it made it a normie game

light dark and anime

It was a double triangle wasn't it?

Change is bad Kappa

what was

oh inside of anima?

yes

Maybe I'm mixing my games, but I thought Fire, Ice, Lightning, Air was also a square

yes

okok, not crazy

got it

https://i.imgur.com/Vtqe3wK.png

so light sucked against everything but dark

Yes, but everything was heavily spell dependent still

low-level anima was shit in powerr compared to light/dark

and mages arent common

or

usually arent

why not just seperate light and dark into their own line of Light and Dark being strong against each other

but maybe that's a bad idea