Yeah
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Saturday, May 23, 2020
What the heck are you forking
What is your site
What is delibird other then a pokemon
the core functionality, is an NginX-RTMP module from like 2016
which someone forked to create a embedable video stream
which a lot of people forked to create various template sites
Are you using any specific fork
one of which a competent dev formed to build a good framework for a database
which I forked to create this
make chat go across the video like niconico
it's my own fork
Leg
That would be pog
I send a few commits back up for real things I've added
but then a lot of it's just stuff I've changed myself
Damn, the man's stuff is going up stream
I don't like commits in general
other than when someone wants to borrow easily sharable code
I don't like open sourced, outsourcing
Ope
where "we all contribute"
fuck that shit
I'll add on and change what you make, but don't expect a hundred people to work for you
There are some projects
where i swear the dev will get jealous of forks which don't share
and shut his own shit down
it's what i would do kappa4
Make your shit better then
rip smile fire
There was a really good github project, for a .flac streaming server / internet radio type thing
which had a dev through a hissy fit, over people making their own verions of the project
since 99% of github GUIs suck
Fork it then
Or let someone else fork and maintain it
github is terrible for that, despite that supposidly being their purpose
Fire, nooo, I liked that one
Yeah, not a huge github person
The github network view
is cancer
and worthless
I just use stuff other people make
Other then just using it to store config files
I'm using a 2018 version of Grocy I like, because it's become some amalgamation of random ideas the dev had
I think the culture of mantaining a fork is dumb
Then don't
I don't
I just am saying, I think forks are dumb
And if others decide it's worth it to maintain then they will
Idk
rename forks to sporks
It's better then just letting devs kill project
if I was in the shoes of some of these devs
I would delete my shit too
Ope
have you ever looked the issue trackers for Github
I do
And contribute issues to them
Kinda a good meme
it's all ESL fags who try to speak english
kids asking why something doesn't work
and lazy idiots suggesting features to add
Yup
And also, constant issue merging to an unrelated issue
making a couple hundred bucks off some simple code, isn't worth even 1 hour of putting up with that shit
Like ope, this isssue has been closed and merged with another
And the shit is not even close to the same issue
annd if you don't look at it, might as well not even publish it in the first place
appak
and yeah, I know that struggle too
For people who Dev simple open source projects, I guess it's just a passion
You really can't make a career out of it
you make money from open source stuff by providing support to corporations for it
I'll break this to you Mint
it's a lot of depressed 20-something year olds
who like the validation of having people use something you make
Ope
rip
and a lot of them either kill themselves, or get a gf and quit
thats how stuff like Hadoop gets monetized
Remindes me of the temple os guy
Rip Terry
There we go
Yeah
