banned-users

but everyone ends up taking here

discord is just better

Site chat would be so nice

I don't mind the site chat

discord needs

channel embedding

^

someone is re-writing the chat functionality, so we'll see what he comes up with

Discord needs to let you resize the window more

i guess if you're on phone its a bit of a hassle

also agree

what if we just watch spooky stream off his website on discord Kappa

i have an account spooky, i just wasn't logged in by default

ik Fire

I just think it would be funny to tie it to Discord

how would that make a difference if discord is shitting itself

Spooky are you talking like an o auth thing

yeah, one of the forks got this working

Yup

Yeah

What the heck are you forking

What is your site

What is delibird other then a pokemon

the core functionality, is an NginX-RTMP module from like 2016

which someone forked to create a embedable video stream

which a lot of people forked to create various template sites

Are you using any specific fork

one of which a competent dev formed to build a good framework for a database

which I forked to create this

make chat go across the video like niconico

it's my own fork

Leg

That would be pog

I send a few commits back up for real things I've added

but then a lot of it's just stuff I've changed myself

Damn, the man's stuff is going up stream

I don't like commits in general

other than when someone wants to borrow easily sharable code

I don't like open sourced, outsourcing

where "we all contribute"

fuck that shit

I'll add on and change what you make, but don't expect a hundred people to work for you

There are some projects

where i swear the dev will get jealous of forks which don't share

and shut his own shit down

it's what i would do kappa4

Make your shit better then

rip smile fire

There was a really good github project, for a .flac streaming server / internet radio type thing

which had a dev through a hissy fit, over people making their own verions of the project

since 99% of github GUIs suck

Fork it then

Or let someone else fork and maintain it

github is terrible for that, despite that supposidly being their purpose

Fire, nooo, I liked that one

Yeah, not a huge github person

The github network view

is cancer

and worthless

I just use stuff other people make

Other then just using it to store config files

I'm using a 2018 version of Grocy I like, because it's become some amalgamation of random ideas the dev had

I think the culture of mantaining a fork is dumb

Then don't

I don't

I just am saying, I think forks are dumb

And if others decide it's worth it to maintain then they will

Idk

rename forks to sporks

It's better then just letting devs kill project

if I was in the shoes of some of these devs

I would delete my shit too

Ope

have you ever looked the issue trackers for Github

I do

And contribute issues to them

Kinda a good meme

it's all ESL fags who try to speak english kids asking why something doesn't work and lazy idiots suggesting features to add

Yup