But they reduced the number of guns
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Tuesday, March 3, 2020
So it succeeded in doing that
The government could; by mandate, paint all the DC monuments purple,
it won't get people to like purple more though
Idk spooky
but was the amount reduced more then the rise of others?
I'd like purple more then
but yes, there would be more purple buildings then
It won't, because that's retarded, spooky
because that'd be funny
What's your point here
Because a black market existing isn't enough reason to say that banning a product has no effect
My point is that moral governing is dumb, and I'm thankful we don't do it much
and I'm glad the left has to deal with that right now
Enforcing morality is the role of the government
the role of the government is to make roads
Because people would never donate to one
I think on the whole, we are not seeing our liberties restricted in meaningful ways
which imo is good
So they enforced the morality of building roads with tax money they take from us against our will
they enforce the morality of increasing our invasive military's strength
I don't even know what kind of system you want gent. What things should not be controlled by the government when it comes to interpersonal interaction
Having a strong military is a great thing, but it's hardly "our" military right now, is it
Just enough things to where society is sustainable and moral
define moral
infact define sustainable
I think both of those are ill defined
Doing good, not killing, not abusing kids, not spreading disease, generally not harming people
and vague
Sustainable, the native population of your country is at replacement rate
And your economy is doing fine and whatnot
acting in a way for the betterment of mankind in general
Is this hard to understand?
ah yes, I too want the government to provide me a childbearing 3D waifu
Hell, throw in a little bit of environmentalism, why not
yes, define good, define abuse, what timescale for sustainable are we talking
Yes, just take it to the extreme for the meme
I am not
what is good
He did
that is vague
sustainable is colonizing other planets before we exhaust the resources and space on earth
we must become a cancer on the galaxy
Time scale? How about an average of 2.3 kids for every adult
If you want the government to encourage repopulation, you can levy all the tax-breaks on children you want, you pump out propaganda like Japan does, you can restrict the rights of women and force them out of the workforce
But it won't raise your repopulation rate meaningfully
that is not a time scale
Japan is moral but not sustainable at this time
What point are you getting at other than making me be overly verbose
I am asking, is a level of control that the government should take dependent on a 10 year plan, or a 1000 year plan
pika we don't know what the population cap for Earth is so its not quantifiable
those both require vastly different levels of control
to properly do
The things that will raise repopulation rate, are so unrelated to the issue itself
should a society be sustainable forever? In that case I can see no such method except for extreme micromanagement
that a government is wasting their time trying to chase after the issue
Even if you think it's all within their right to do
all nations fall eventually
Here, this will make you happy. First I'd want to cut back on every bit of unnecessary spending used to solve "inequality" and the like
okay, I can agree with that
Then after seeing what unfolds, you regulate bit by bit to make it as optimal as possible
remove the Federal Reserve and the Department of Education too
just remove america
if you remove america there is no problem with america
I don't know every bit of a policy to enforce as supreme dictator, but I know the government should play a role in enforcing a degree of morality
rename america to canada
make canada become canada 2
shatter the nation into 4ish smaller nations
better yet
make canada america
boom now america has free health care
We can make cocaine illegal and the world is fine, but banning alcohol makes shit hit the fan. There are clearly good and bad ways of regulating
Didn't the war on drugs turn out to be a massive failure for the US
annihilate the blacks
In what way
then the roads have competent drivers
don't ban basic cultural norms like drinking alcohol
drugs are still everywhere and you dumped a lot of money to not fix the problem
We now have the largest prison population in the world, draining our society and creating a worthless class of people
yes the war on drugs is a waste of money
leigit was sitting behind someone turning right at a red light and they sat there
like could turn right on red
