banned-users

what do you categorize as "bad" for a kids movie

I categorize kids movies the same as normal movies

because kids movies can be good too

Kids movies are more focused on keeping your attention and telling/doing jokes/gags. While I wouldn't "rate" them differently, I hold them to a lower standard when it comes to story, plot and basically everything else

I see no reason to do that. A good kids movie can do those right and still be for kids

because, it doesnt NEED to do that

I really fucking like Wall E, that is a good movie and is a kids movie.

and?

being for kids is not an excuse for being trash

The story is about you

appaK

sorry youre a sid character

side*

You have bias from being an actor gosh pika

kappa

I should also not I have really low standards as is, so if I lower my standards further than I will have no standards

if a kids movie can't hit my low standards what the fuck is it doing

I wouldn't say lower

just

So, look at the inverse Pika "adult" movies, that are made specifically for adults they gate themselves off from being enjoyed by all ages, by inserting content only a certain age/demographic will enjoy

While that is true, it does not change the fact that any movie can be well written and not just a heap of absolute trash, regardless of who it is written for

the plot doesnt matter to kids

What kid

is looking at the movie

Is this movie for 2 year olds

and saying

"It doesnt make sense that sonic can run that fast!"

I don't think "plot" is the right word

scenes?

I think a lot of kids movies lack the connecting bits, between story points

this happens... and then this happens

it doesn't make sense that the animators deliberately didn't use an existing model from the games and tweak it

and thats all it needs, because the kids dont give a god damn shit about the story

well

they do

i wouldnt say that id say

Kids are amused by you jingling keys in their face, does not mean a movie that is just that is fine

what

????

um.. have you watched YouTube lately Pika

Yes, I am aware youtube is trash

but nonetheless

Kids don't need all of that, because the jokes, gags, action and cool stuff is more important

I think that's why they started using the term "family movie"

then explaining/showing why sonic is there

rather than kids movie

I am not saying kids will not enjoy this, I just see zero reason to make a product that is bad when you could do things to make it less bad

It's easier to make a bad movie

I like a lot of bad things

the issue is making the kids believe that that is Sonic and not some living tumor

such as Re:zero

but appaK

I feel like

People overstress how sonic looks- I'm not overly definding it, its really bad, but it isnt absolutely horrid

its what I expected

No Max, it's REALLY bad

is it

They could have easily made it less bad

And that's what has me excited

the movie looks well put together

And doesn't look low-budget

I honestly think

But Sonic looks so missformed to me

sonic could look a lot worse

Oh, of course

He'd not low budget, which is what's funny

Should have made it sonichu, made it an underdog story about chris

The problem is sonic normally

is super skinny legs/body

The legs don't translate

yeah

They should of just had him running at top speed all movie

So they didn't need to animate legs

use sonic boom sonic

kappa

Werewolf Sonic

AWOOOO

werehog

fucking fake fun