and I never took any advanced shit
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
its not bad
im just confused as shit on taking the derivative of dy/dx = (y-2x)/(1+2y)
literally product rule, and chain rule, then rearange for dy/dx
do it the same way
replace y with the negative of what you solved for y as
product rule?
quotient rule rather
oh yeah
wait chain rule?
where can i use chain rule
and take derivatives of y as if they were x, then multiply it by dy/dx
i know the chain rule
then sub in dy/dx that you solved for before
yeah i tried that
that is what you are doing when you take a derivative of y and make it dy/dx
and ended up with a mess of shit
should be a mess of shit
give me a sex
hot
Alternatively
do not sub in your solution of dy/dx
just solve dy/dx at the point
then sub in the solution
what is the point?
at the point (0,3) find the rate of change in the slope of the curve with respect to x
so derivative of that second equation
at 0,3
I mean
I got -95/7^3
prob did it wrong
Been a while since I have done this
You're doing it wrong Pika, you need to seperate like terms first
How the fuck am I supposed to write math equations in discord, fuck
Seperate into y/(1+2y) and -2x/(1+2y)
I guess that makes much more sense than what I idd
This is fundemental calc shit, not real calc
This is what you'd be taught right after fundemental theorum and the limit proofs
I was taught this shit in hs before I knew of the fundemental theorem, they just taught us the process and explained nothing
My point is this version of calc is irrelevant, you'll never actually do this shit
so uh
gimme a sec
i think i may have gotten a nanswer
that is somewhat rational
Should be rational
irrational numbers are unlikely in this
Kappa
(-10(x+y)(x-y))/(x-2y)^3
thats x^2+y^2 not (x+y)(x-y)
but ima try spooky's way
wait i think i will arrive at the same answer
either way it feels very wrong
so...
i have no idea what to do t this point
pemdas
what are you trying to do?
@Phijkchu_Pikachu any chance this could be used to solve his problem? Kappa
Yeah I think the hessian will help
gotta use that sophomore mathematics to solve this
literally just got to this in calc 3 today
it just came up on monday in my machine learning class
thats the only reason i remember it existing
maybe you do
X = (0,3)
transpose(X) * H * Xokay so when i tried to substitute in
You get all that potahto, just use the hessian
i got .25
Kappa
which is very not right
i think
#math
