autism

funnily enough, population growth actually speeds up the more overworked a populace is

until you hit the point of Communist utopias

where everyone's starving

If they made catgirls im sure there would be a significant increase in sex

with sterile testtube clones

Yea

Everyone overlooks the best part of the catgirl revolution

But

they'd have no rights

zero

the same rights we give to monekys, 98-99% "human"

Id suppose itd depend on how human they made them

Freaks

Well intelligence

it would have to apply across the board though

if you draw the line too high, suddenly you strip the rights from actual humans

I mean im not disagreeing that they probably wouldnt have rights for a bit but

or the opposite, and we have to acknowledge the rights of animals

I think it's a good think Reggie, I'm not complaining

you can't genetically create a servant class, and then expect to give them rights

if we can pump out test tube babies in a lab, to do field work as long as we toe the line, and make sure they fall just under the line to be considered human

legal slavery

there's no way the US or UN doesn't try to stop them

You can create a set of laws around the ethical treatment of servants tho

but the point is, you have to draw the line somewhere

we can breed dogs now

train them

the line would be promising to nuke japan again if they keep doing human genetic hybrid experimentation

what happens when you modify dog genomes to become "better dogs"

no human added yet

I mean hell, we domesticated dogs in the neolithic era

with gene editing, who knows what we can do

I think lines would start getting drawn on the ones that were aware of their situation, most would prob be happy with the catgirl life because theyd have somewhere inbetween animal and human intelligence

people try to draw that now though, monkeys and dolphins

hell, even cows

are all "smart" or "aware" depending how you define it

They lack connection from speech tho which is where you get into an even more grey area with catgirls if they speak

parrots speak

how much is it going to suck, if we have perfect cat girls in every way

I mean theyd either have freedom of speech here or if they didnt have rights you could just tell them to, so they could prob nyaa

they can only go wau wau

But if they were fuckin mutes then rip

Now the real think is

Which would have less rights, artificial intelligence or catgirls

true ai is impossible don't listen to the screaming idiots

we'll limit the ability for AI to self-reproduce

so them, inherently

cat girls are probably also impossible

though, I guess we;ll neuter our catboys

I think it depends how you define "catgirl" Leg

you won't need to neuter them, they'll die in 2 months after gestation or just be infertile

I don't care how human ai acts, it deserves no rights

Fuck soma

Oof its gonna off gent first

it will always just be mimicry anyway

and any sentience it displays is a troll by one of the engineers who trained it to say that

It just does what it's programmed too

Idk if you make something that mimics a brain, and then start teaching it things, thats not really that much different than a person

No actual thought within, self-preservation instinct isn't necessarily going to be a thing

it does not mimic a brain

Well not now

It comes down to your theories of how a brain work

and whether they can sufficiently be modeled/simulated by a computer

AI is a tool, it can go haywire and fuck things up, but will it serve its own "interests"?

Most things at a base level of our universe can be, so eventually it makes sense that a brain could be

but to Leg's credit

AI mimicking a brain is really such an arbitrary design choice

at that point, it'd likely be a mimicry still

It could just be out-performed by an AI without that stipulation

Brains arent magic, eventually well know how they fully work and we can create stuff that replicates their function

ai doesn't mimic a brain gent

never has

Wasn't saying that leg

And maybe thats why no true ais work K_WeSmart

that's just it though Reggie, where is the limit to computer architecture we can model and model and model but can we sufficiently create a device that is able to solve the problem

I'm saying IF they made an ai that mimics the brain, it would be incredibly arbitrary and likely perform worse than other AI

our do we run into the halting problem chasing after a brain model

neuroscientists still don't know how the brain actually works so thats irrelevant

No matter what, it's a bunch of circuits and wires