Its technically a valid strategy
autism
Who is Rem though?
Jump to date
Monday, August 12, 2019
If your population wont breed, grow your population in a lab
funnily enough, population growth actually speeds up the more overworked a populace is
until you hit the point of Communist utopias
where everyone's starving
If they made catgirls im sure there would be a significant increase in sex
Yea
Everyone overlooks the best part of the catgirl revolution
But
they'd have no rights
zero
the same rights we give to monekys, 98-99% "human"
Id suppose itd depend on how human they made them
Well intelligence
it would have to apply across the board though
if you draw the line too high, suddenly you strip the rights from actual humans
I mean im not disagreeing that they probably wouldnt have rights for a bit but
or the opposite, and we have to acknowledge the rights of animals
I think it's a good think Reggie, I'm not complaining
you can't genetically create a servant class, and then expect to give them rights
if we can pump out test tube babies in a lab, to do field work
as long as we toe the line, and make sure they fall just under the line to be considered human
legal slavery
You can create a set of laws around the ethical treatment of servants tho
but the point is, you have to draw the line somewhere
we can breed dogs now
train them
what happens when you modify dog genomes to become "better dogs"
no human added yet
I mean hell, we domesticated dogs in the neolithic era
with gene editing, who knows what we can do
I think lines would start getting drawn on the ones that were aware of their situation, most would prob be happy with the catgirl life because theyd have somewhere inbetween animal and human intelligence
people try to draw that now though, monkeys and dolphins
hell, even cows
are all "smart" or "aware" depending how you define it
They lack connection from speech tho which is where you get into an even more grey area with catgirls if they speak
how much is it going to suck, if we have perfect cat girls in every way
but for legal reasons they cant nyaa
I mean theyd either have freedom of speech here or if they didnt have rights you could just tell them to, so they could prob nyaa
But if they were fuckin mutes then rip
Now the real think is
Which would have less rights, artificial intelligence or catgirls
we'll limit the ability for AI to self-reproduce
so them, inherently
though, I guess we;ll neuter our catboys
I think it depends how you define "catgirl" Leg
Oof its gonna off gent first
Idk if you make something that mimics a brain, and then start teaching it things, thats not really that much different than a person
Well not now
It comes down to your theories of how a brain work
and whether they can sufficiently be modeled/simulated by a computer
Most things at a base level of our universe can be, so eventually it makes sense that a brain could be
but to Leg's credit
at that point, it'd likely be a mimicry still
Brains arent magic, eventually well know how they fully work and we can create stuff that replicates their function
And maybe thats why no true ais work K_WeSmart
that's just it though Reggie, where is the limit to computer architecture
we can model and model and model
but can we sufficiently create a device that is able to solve the problem
