Search archive

Did polu reply by saying "that is nuXs"

also, to heal memechat

https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB320

I didn't post this before, but they actually criminalized livestreaming while driving in Virginia a month or two ago

idk what it is about shonens

but it got close

MHA didn't get quite that bad

I prefer anything that isn't a desert dungeon

That would require actually wanting to overturn this, so we'll see if it happens

send someone to Barret's office and have her aid in drafting the language of the next EO and do this again

The dissent to the ruling is that Trump's EO was too broad, and it still almost passed

This case was not a serious challenge to the interpretation, which is why it being 5-4 is crazy

the margins on everything are so fucking thin rn

I cannot beleive this was a 5-4 ruling

https://x.com/america/status/2071966675121922075

RIP @heir's job

I think it's really hard (borderline impossible) to control the internet, so I'm less worried about the slippery slope here but that's the optimist in me, I don't think this needs the best intentions to be broadly good, and I think if anything this will have positive effects one-two rungs out from the massive commercia

The Microsoft studio shutdowns get announce this afternoon

this is real

@taxes

also, most important part of the bill

they're obviously not

it's like asking if Nyaa is going to age restrict their site access to kids

because they're all piracy sites too

but they also just... don't comply with any of this

there were other crackdowns which hurt dedicated porn sites in the past, and tha AI deepfake stuff will hurt porn sites

but this is clearly not a porn ban

I'm not even super anti-porn

appak

it's not

type replies

I think the pedophile fears for all of this are just funny too, "what if pedophiles set up sites to verify kids' ages and use that nefariously"

I really do think everyone would benefit from having a kid internet

Also, I'm obviously opposed to the idea of requiring verification to use a computer (which this is not), but it would be easier rather than verifying site-by-site, to verify once at the OS level or the browser level, and have that signal/flag be provided to sites "yes this user is a non-bot, non-kid"

so more of those verification sytems are CC only now

Depends how they implement it Leg, bots have an easier time spinning up debit cards

Do you just dislike CC verification?

In general I like the idea of pushing the lower-tier kids off the big internet, and moving them to dedicated apps that are just4kids This does (actually) empower parents to control when their kids are able to use the internet

Pika, YouTube kids is like 0-7 y/o content

Yes, they 100% already do

This is YouTube kids Pika

it's probably in-compliance

I think as long as they action reports in a timely manner

for non-porn sites, if you don't age-gate your site, you have a bunch of requirements to protect kids

the 2nd part to the bill I'm also broadly in-favor of

it also fucks over advertisers, which I think is a win

Sites can also verify the users age in any way they want, other than "(2) Provide that a user confirming that the user is not a minor is not sufficient to verify age."