A lot of the big leaps post transformers being implemented are upping compute power and harvesting more data for training
rawb
Jump to date
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
I think we will hit actual AGI in my lifetime, not by 2030, and it will not be a LLM
It will incorperate aspects of how LLMs work, but LLMs by themselves won't make it to that
artificial general intelligence
aka actual AI in the scifi sense
or moreso that than what we have now
I don't think that LLMs are as rigid a construct as I initially thought
the initial approach to training felt self-limiting, and I would have been the first person to tell you it was going to hit a wall and our fun markov chain toys were going to all be forgotten about
and I think for a while, the investment has literally been
I think they are not rigid, there is a lot you can do with prediction based reasoning that LLMs do
invest billions ---> build a big training set ---> magic---> super AI
and its crazy investors went for that
because I do think we ended up on this current course almost accidentally
I think the limit is, a LLM cannot freely think beyond its data set. I think you might be able to get higher results using multiple LLMs in parallel doing different things
but you are not overcoming the fact that LLMs are limited by their dataset
when some advanced network of them do, are you just going to stop calling them LLMs?
I'd call them a network of LLMs
I think you can approximate human thought with enough LLMs running in parralel, but actual AGI is beyond that
maybe a function without distinction, but I do not support the idea of claiming what we have now is more than it is, a tool that ranges from not to very useful depending on what you use it for
I'd also agree with that, nothing that exists currently that is generally available, is more than a productivity tool
And I think people who are claiming "Google Gemini is alive" are retarded
I think when a LLM can update its own training data in reasonable time, without human intervention, and without imploding itself, I will consider us closer to your view
If I start seeing things slowdown that suggest we're anywhere near the top of an S-curve, I'd also be more aligned with you
I'm not naiive, if it stops working suddenly, then this is all dead and gay
I think it can improve, but I think the cost to improve it is getting higher for lower returns, and the only reason you have not seen it slow down is instead of letting it slow down they are just burning trillions to get these diminishing returns
when they stop dumping actual trillions on this, you'll hit the top of the S
I think that's probably the fundamental difference in view, I see progress accelerating right now
burning the trillions is working
It'll work until the returns are diminished to the point that you have to burn quadrillions to get the same returns
then we print more money
line go up
Okay, I will put it this way, I do not think an LLM, which has the sum total of all human knowledge as it exists right now, and the entire planet is reformed to exist to be in service to (only the data ceneter, factories making more memory etc, power generation) will be AGI
and I think there will be something in the next ~2 years that I will consider AGI
sure, but it will not be an LLM
it'll be a Network of LLMs
mtcdood, it's worse
they are mostly convinced they are creating god
the actual AI lab people I work with
are unirronically convinced they are going to meet a god if they do a good enough job
I think the people funding it are doing it for what mtcdood is saying, I think the people working on it are delusional like spooky said
also most think their work will make them immortal
lol
RIP
Honestly spooky, I will go the other way with my take from yours
Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 also most think their work will make them immortal
so, they're weird fanatics?
I think this huge LLM push has caused the opposite, and delayed actual AGI by probably 10 years
