Archive details

Discord archive

Neon Genesis Phijkchu

Lifecycle
July 17, 2020 – Present
Snapshot
Through August 30, 2026
Preserved messages
June 19, 2020 – August 30, 2026
Members
712
Messages
1,098,506
Channels
43

Archive navigation

rawb

Jump to date
Pins
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think when a LLM can update its own training data in reasonable time, without human intervention, and without imploding itself, I will consider us closer to your view
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
I think it can improve, but I think the cost to improve it is getting higher for lower returns, and the only reason you have not seen it slow down is instead of letting it slow down they are just burning trillions to get these diminishing returns
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
Okay, I will put it this way, I do not think an LLM, which has the sum total of all human knowledge as it exists right now, and the entire planet is reformed to exist to be in service to (only the data ceneter, factories making more memory etc, power generation) will be AGI
mtcdood rawb
I think a lot of the AI hype are people who know they can get huge loans and investments, then leave the company before it collapses.
mtcdood rawb
I don't know if I mentioned it, but the AI company I worked for did in fact fire me for pointing out my boss was incompetent and we had 10-15 people doing whatever they wanted all day.
Phijkchu_Pikachu rawb
Spooky, hear me out. They do not actually believe this, but because they work for Anthropic they really need to upsell it, so whenever you are around they have to act like they think they are causing the end of the world
legorhin rawb
a ton of the LLM breakthrough methods apply to general machine learning so I have to pay attention to that stuff even if I find LLMs generally pointless
legorhin rawb
At ICML this year there was a lecture about how optimization theory is kind of a waste of time in ML because the random breakthroughs rarely have any theoretical basis and kind of just work. ML research is weird.
mtcdood rawb
I think the personalized stuff is a bit on the creepy side, but I can't articulate a specific ethics issue. The supply/demand stuff I actually support.
mtcdood rawb
Take for example bread and milk. The store sells them at cost or maybe even at a loss, because if they get your feet in the door you might buy some 25% markup breakfast cereal or steak.
mtcdood rawb
What products they choose to sell cheap changes from time to time. That's a low tech, low frequency form of dynamic pricing.
mtcdood rawb
Well here's the deal. Your staple food might be bread. My staple food might be rice. Now the store can give me a better price on rice than what you pay. If you rarely buy rice, what do you care?

This archive is read-only — snapshot through August 30, 2026

Channels:
Density:

Jump to date

Local bookmark

Choose a color

This marker stays in this browser. Your choice becomes the default for the next bookmark.