media.tenor.com
politics
Jump to date
Monday, May 2, 2022
i am glad you two are looking for proper sources.
you can use those to come to a practical solution in your clearly defined problem
out of a cursary glance, i also think it seems like those dudes in mexico were discriminated against, but not slaves, tho i might be wrong on that?
the Wikipedia article is very incomplete
Replying to Dolfin #dolfinmaster what did i just say
that 74% of slave owners in america were not white
theYaqui were slaves
source pol
which i guess makes sense since most europeans are beige not white
wtf does that mean, lol
but still, i do not believe you on that for a second
what did Dolf even claim
I was busy reading about Mexico
74% of slave owners in the US were non white
uh....
im pretty sure he counts them as jews still
Dolf, that's not a true stat
he said verbatim?
he said verbatim: "" because this is a text chat (f.d. Gent)
that is what I said
read the first question
it was about the US
what
dunce parse, re read what I said and what he said
I think you are getting confused
do they count middle managers on the plantations as slave owners?
denied
ok guys make sure you move the window down so you can't see who is typing
Zyton, I think Dolf was just wrong on that one
maybe something about how blacks enslaved other blacks
also DOLF, what time frame, DOLF?
and he just got stats mixed up
no, DOLF
There where a lot of slaves owned by native americans
% wise? dunno
wow dolfin i cannot believe you confirmed that as fact
i mean, obv most africans have enslaved africans, most europeans have enslaved euopreans etc, gotta be like 99% if youre talking about that
brazil was the last to outlaw it in the western hemisphere i think, which was in like, 1888, that is unless spookys mexico argument holds water
and slavery
states rights got caught in the crossfire
im right
and you wanna know why that is?
Replying to PirateMan64 #zytohn brazil was the last to outlaw it in the western hemisphere i think, which was in like, 1888, that is unless spookys mexico argument holds water
Spooky's does. I don't have a source on hand, but I researched it over a decade ago and did a report on it for class.
because laws take time to make lmao
thats actually a really shitty argument
