Replying to Spooky Phijkchu #spooky.131 if some activist sysadmin did this, that's going to be spooky
it will be you
politics
Monday, May 2, 2022
you did it
if this is a loss for privacy, or what the current case is even alleging
when he retires
he retires at the end of the session
this is actually how it's supposed to work honestly
same with acting justices and such
dying on the bench wasn't supposed to be a thing
yeah, you can recall justices
but that's also kind of not kosher
Democrats didn't pack the courts
so Republicans won't power grab
the mechanism isn't recalling a nominee or something Dolf
it'd be the same way they can remove any of the 9 justices
whenever they want
I think it's got a fancy name
This leaking is honestly going to be a shitstorm
regardless of what it says
So is this supposed to be the dems win the midterms magic bullet attempt
have dem primaries already happened?
because most democrats aren't even in favour of abortions, they pay lip service to Roe v Wade
actually voting on a pro abortion bill, which is what they'd have to do
is HARD
this helps republicans I think
because there will be no unified Left platform
everyone will be purity testing each other
yeah the public isn't for mass abortion
but the party is crazy
At least how I understood Roe v Wade, I think I liked the ruling
the application of the 4th amendment to be about privacy
is something I feel strongly about
how many people actually understand row v wade and just know it as a buzz term
and I want congress to settle abortion with a law
not a court ruling
so I need to keep reading this draft
that would be ideal
the courts aren't the place to write laws
the nuance of abortion is also something no one talks about
same with SIDS
women are really good at killing babies
like, really really good at it
without even trying
yeah they are
you think this leak will change the vote?
make a judge cower out
lol, no way
I just don't know how you make abortion illegal, other than shutting down overt abortion and neonatal harvesting clinics
so some law existing to legislate what can/can't exist is needed
also isn't his supreme court leak a first
I think it is
especially a draft opinion like this
Yeah I don't think an active case/issues ever leaked before
thats big
the press gets indications all the time, and usually get an early copy of releases ~1 hour ahead of time
but are bound not to report on it until the court makes their announcement
this was stolen is my guess
and I wouldn't be surprised if there's a huge meltdown over the "leak"
fucking
they're weaking our right to privacy
this opinion is too long
for something this seminal, brevity is warrented