politics

yes

no

you are literally arguing sementics

well actually no i agree

if we didnt have a constitution we would be like canada now

so yeah

"our constitution prevents them from being taken" who gave you the rights in the first place

if it didnt say you cant take them we wouldnt have them

yes

they are called god given rights for a reason

okay, god does not exist

so who gave you the rights

ok but thats not the point

the answer is, the men in charge gave you the rights

decided they are fundemental

then enshrined them

but thats not the constitution giving them

its preventing them from being taken

where did they enshrine them dolf

I wonder

look up the 10th amendment for me pika

okay, that does not say that the constitution did not enshire these rights

whats your point

do you have a document from before the constitution that enshires these rights (that also does not disprove what I am saying, it just moves the goalpost a bit)

any right not in the constitution is reserved to the people

the articles of confederation

okay, so those enshrined the rights

I still think its semantics

because those rights only exist via an act of your government

the constitution is then just a companion piece to the articles of confederation

saying "these things we said you have cannot be taken away"

theres a fundamental difference between "congress shall make no law.. prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech" and " you can protest as long as we say you can"

you do not have rights

you have priveledges

you can protest as much as you want in canada actually

clearly not

if the truckers wanted to stand at the side of the road with signs saying Trudeau kills babies with vaccines they would be allowed to

or else you get trampled for picking a bike up 2 inches off the ground

or beaten

its almost like the truckers became a literal public nuisance

or have the mounties say "dont kick them all out so next week can get their overtime"

Have the mounties said that

and I mean, to be fair, that is probably a joke if they did

suck the leather harder

dude, you are so bad faith in talking about a Country you understand literally nothing about

is that proven to be real

I don't know if you know this, things on the internet are permissibly easy to fake

considering them dragging a guy between two trucks and beating him, then looking around to make sure no one saw

its a tossup at this point

Okay, so you have no proof

but it aligns with your idea of what is going on

so it is true

ok so you have no proof its fake

I am not making a positive claim

but it goes against your idea so its fake

you are

I assume literally everything I see if fake until proven otherwise

Clearly

considering you still dont believe they ran into the crowd with the horse

I literally do

I just think the protestors were purposfully in the way

ok so

because they are retards

thats not running into the crowd then

?

if you think the crowd got in the way of the horse

then they didnt run into the crowd

yes they did?

you can run into someone and have it be their fault

running into them is a seperate issue from why

God I can't wait for this to be over so you and gent can go back to not thinking about Canada ever and pretending like you understand our laws

"laws"

Dolf have you ever read the canadian charter

or the constitution act

why should I

exactly

stop talking like you know literally anything about our laws

I have read a lot of your laws because I try to be informed when I speak