politics
Sunday, July 14, 2024
He said the reason why the snipers didn’t take the guy out immediately was probably a combination of slow communication and the fact that the snipers are actually scanning areas much further away from the scene, and can’t see that close without adjusting, which is what the sniper did after hearing the gunshots
because trolls went out and created credibly fake accounts to troll the media
that's not a knock against them either, it's just funny how 15 years after the Boston Bombing witchhunt the internet still can't ever get it right
uh Dialga, look again
there are 4 notes
Wikipedia notes are synonymous with "information is disputed"
since you only have to note things that aren't agreed upon facts
I think etiquette is to source quotes 100% of the time, provide a note for a substantive paragraph, and note anything disputed
multiple notes is almost always disputed info, and there will 99% of the time be a talk page about anything getting double-noted
Context: Ron Johnson (getting interviewed and wrote this tweet) made the chart that Trump was using
idk, I don't find this that surprising
So Dialga, I had an interesting realization semi-recently
if you think back to the American Revolution
Boston tea party, raids on the British, etc.
a lot of our founding fathers were in their early 20s
Washington and the generals were a bit older
but a lot of the idealists, were super young
it's often the 20-year-olds who cause radical change
but idk what the guys motive was in this case, it doesn't feel idological or else I'd have assumed there was a manifesto
could be suicide by cop, could be highly anti-Trump, could be some ideological sperg for a niche policy
ok, here's the Boston Tea Party stats
of the ~200 main participants, 9 were older than 40
26 were under 20, majority were 20-30
yeah, not saying it's 1:1, just that being 20 isn't crazy young for political V
and; last aside I swear, also remember that only 2% of the colonists supported the revolution
overwhelming majority supported the British, 2nd most common sentiment was indifference
it never actually got that high, most people thought British rule was preferable into the 1800s
leadup to the War of 1812 was when people started valuaing their independence
which is about 1 generation later
oh they 100% did, British irregulars were all just colonists
which was the majority of their army
British sent over VERY few regular troops
they sent over German (Hessian) mercs, who defected after being bought out by Washington (using French gold)
and used colonist irregulars, who didn't have the drilling to sustain long fieldings
American strategy and unlimited French/Spanish support is why we won
remember, the largest battle of the Revolution happened in Spain
with zero American participation
it's not like 2% fought
yeah, I will agree there
the more radical party attracted more people willing to enlist and fight (which is pretty in-line with being radical)
Replying to Dialga #god_of_time how radicalizing was his environment to make him do this kind of thing
which is why i said this. i dont mean to say 20 is too young, just weird. because you'd have to be in a radicalizing environment to put your life at risk for something you have no stakes in
that's a good point
I didn't make that connection, mb Dialga