"I understand pulling off the content that is stupid and bullying but what about like raising a concern that's actually useful? In this case let's say with the BLM movement there was alot of people giving death threats to the guy who killed George Floyd and his entire life is ruined etc, but if the government censored the problem don't you think there will be an outrage? I think censoring stupid stuff is similar to like stopping a riot from going out of control but actually useful messages shouldn't be deleted. There is a problem and that's plagiarism it's wrong. We should call it out as it is and show that we don't stand for it. Most of what I see was mainly education toward the situation, and the memes can be deleted etc, but what about the victims who contacted him to get credit and he blocked them. This is basically showing that you are ignoring the victim in this situation which imo should matter more. You are basically supporting plagiarism by silencing the information."