general

so maybe he was a real professor

and thats why /r/statistics thought he was wrong

The paper had conceptual errors that do not pass the sniff test

shit I, with only an undergrad amount of knowledge could notice

If it is actually a professor, its a shit one

it is harvard

harvard can have shitty profs

(meaning liberal hellhole)

oh you meant it the other way

lol

school's quality =/= 100% of profs are good

I imagine the worst harvard prof could be on par with some undergrads

and just got there through nepotism/is old

this is funny

This is the gayest thing I have seen

why is this a gif

I love it

furry confirmed

my favourite part is the part under the furry they forgot to colour in one of the frames

lol fire

Fire what level of autism do you have

nice work

yeah

oh thats what that is

I noticed that

WHY

I am sick of that gif

homophobic

it was gross when schlatt did it

its grosser when you do it

it really was

that means you watched his video with james charles

gay

heeeeey

the among us video?

sisters

yes I watched that

not only has he not talked about the carson thing

this is his most recent tweet https://twitter.com/jschlatt/status/1345996069906370562

BUNGER BUNGER BUNGER

he did like charlies response

charlie as in critical?

or a different one

Oh I see

I have a question about cp

a legit question

go on

so you know those famous pictures of naked little kids

like that one on the Beatles album cover

Legally I am going to say no

but yes

I know what you mean

is it illegal to own that photo?

like, it's clearly a naked child who is not yours

So, I have no idea. What I do know is I have seen pictures on twitter of nude children that do not get taken down because they are family photos at nude beaches

its art

so I guess intent of the photo matters

?

but like, isn't everything "art" at this point Dolf

yeas

yes

porn is art to an extent

but art isnt porn

art can be porn

yes

its visually stimulating

but not all

oh well

i mean in the same vein as food porn right

its not actually pron

the reason I ask this, is I was watching a movie with my family tonight

I guess it depends on how lose you define art and how lose you define porn

porn

there is a certain level of definition where they overlap

there was a case on something similar spooky

supreme court