general

are not crimes

i am not driving

i am simply pressing a pedal and spinning a wheel

Are seatbelts even a crime for adults

god spooky are you sure you arent jewish

those are retard checks

yes

Yes

they are in VA

you get fines

^

ive seen jews be less specific in arguments than this

CLICK IT OR TICKET!!!11!!1

Seatbelts are mandatory except in the case you have an old car that does not have seatbelts

Because people can’t be asked to spend two seconds to buckle in

Eh, seatbelts I can see are more natural selection than anything

the thing with seatbelts is

honestly spooky, seatbelts I am more willing to concede then drinking

because if you crash its you who dies

But if you're drunk or checking your phone, you endanger more than just yourself

I know most of you here hate alcohol for some reason

if you get in an acciedent your body can fly into the road causing other accidents

but texting while driving is the same shit

so seatbelt makes sense in my mind

Yeah, wearing a seat belt doesn't make you drive better

Seatbelts are understandable

having a phone is not "reckless driving"

it

is

It is to text while driving

It definitely is

tuning the radio isn't "reckless driving"

While I think it's better to have less people dying in general

Tuning the radio is less focus intensive

reckless driving, is actively disobeying the road marking s

while driving

no

yes

you are nitpicking and biased i win bye bye

by an order of magnitude

And I usually see them on their phones or doing makeup

Pika, what crime do you consider violating road signs and markings?

where does it say the only stipulation of reckless driving is violating signs and markings

around here it's the same Gent, but eating is a lot worse

why do i have to stop when they red light tells me too

why should a light dictate my actions

then don't call it reckless driving Dolf

I fundamentally disagree with your definition of reckless driving spooky so that question is meaningless

We're not gonna turn the exception into the rule

just because you dont understand the definition doesnt mean everyone else is wrong

do you draw a distinction between behaving dangerously in a car and actually disobeying road signs?

no

I do

no

you are the minority

I don't care how much pirate blood you have in you

you are wrong

both are reckless endagerment

I don't think I am

that's something else Pika, but I get what you mean

what do you think about indecent exposure laws spooky

I think we fundamentally disagree on this then

they're overencompassing, but good in concept

Okay, if we did not call it reckless driving

what should it be called

are you fine with laws against drinking and driving

these laws exist already

and he isnt fine with it

or do you think you should be allowed to down a bottle of makers mark and crash into your pregnant girlfriend by 'accident'

I already have very little sympathy for people who regularly get drunk, I don't care to make any exceptions here

im gonna go shoot up heroin and take some acid

then drive

ex*

im not reckless here

I think that any law should be based on your actions, not on the propensity to committ bad actions

IT IS

how hard is it to drink responsibly

YOUR ACTION

I think drinking and choosing to drive is an action spooky