general
Jump to date
Saturday, December 12, 2020
You defending your waifu
>don't like him but I am willing to take his word exclusively on the truth of this matter
You keep bringing up stuff he has claimed that he has not proved
as counters
I have a full paper that explains its methodology and analysis
that I read
if they were just claiming he cheated in words I would be less inclined to believe them
I read dreams response too and was not impressed with it
he made a response
I read it
it does not counter the math sufficiently
a lot of it attempts to counter the why but the why does not matter
in order of importances, the fact that it occured > how > why
He has nothing, he is going to scream to stop the count then move on
Does not matter
okay, but the paper is not arguing the how
its arguing the fact that he did cheat
which he evidently did
it does not
You do not need to know how someone cheated to know they cheated
knowing how would be useful to stop future cases of cheating
Gent is just enjoying his shitposting
let me google this
" A positive result in the test may paradoxically be more likely to be an erroneous result than an actual occurrence, even if the test is very accurate. "
okay that is not the case here
