general
Jump to date
Friday, July 24, 2020
I'm not
I don't think we need to protect teens from these so called "abusers"
as if they should live their lives pretending 19-25 year olds, don't exist
until they magically hit 18, and are then allowed to date them
but suddenly, a 17 year old isnt?
it's such an arbitrary line to draw, for something that shouldn't be tied to age
driving, enlisting, drinking, smoking have reasons to tie access to the age of majority
dating doesn't
what the fuck do you date for Dolf?
if not for sex
and I've said it before, stages of school/life matter more than raw age
high school/college, are all fine
middddle school/college, less fine
grade school/college, not fine
it's way less arbitrary than age
kids hit puberty 11-14
on average
pre pubesent kids SHOULD NOT be dating anyone post-pubescent
but why does it matter, is a sexually developed 15 year old, is dating a 19 year old
if they've hit puberty, yes Dolf
it's less fine
according to what I said earlier
it's a big gap
but assuming they've both hit puberty
I see no issue, other than a logistic one
ah yes, sex is murder
>rape
I'm not talking about rape
rape; as a word, means something
and it doesn't mean "regrets the sex later"
rape means physically forcing someone to have sex against their will or while they're unconscious
none of this bullshit about "I was two beers in, I couldn't consent"
or "I didn't know what I was doing, therefore it was rape"
being underage, doesn't mean you can't date/sleep with people
it just means that society has some arbitrary line for when it's "acceptable"
I demand government mandated chasity belts for pre 17 year olds
that is my contribution
I've seen people argue pika
that to prevent it
we should castrate/fix all children, and then revert the prrocedure when they turn 18
because people are TERRIFIED
of the idea
that sexuallly mature humans
have sex
with other sexually mature humans
If you don't want to fuck someone under 4'10 Dolf, that's fine
