this is Pyrrhics arc
general
Wednesday, August 26, 2026
On the one hand Sheen seems dumb enough to think that Zatch Bell could be Jimmy, and fall for Zatch's arguments because Jimmy is smart.
On the other hand the Adventures of Jimmy Neutron feels like the kind of show where if they ever did a Freaky Friday plot, Sheen wouldn't notice that the characters voices have changed. Or maybe he would notice, but then quickly brush it off.
How is the chop stick box even in competition with an action figurine, if on one outing with the chop stick box it falls apart that alone makes it the worst toy ever. You would be ridiculed into oblivion for years for having that “toy.”
You guys are just voting based on your favorite show and not the accuracy on which toy is cooler
I read the question as who will be the most convincing and concvince the other one, so I voted Sheen
Replying to Phijkchu_Pikachu #klombak Someone has to do them
Tbf, anytime I think of a poll in the middle of the day. I tell myself its gay and retarded about 1 minute after.
that is also true
polls are either by the pollmaster, whomever that may be in the current arc, or its some weird vc argument/discussion
local news for Spooky, here's a fun bodycamera from my county
won't top the woman, but it's pretty good
Thursday, August 27, 2026
spobgobob vs bgi gbgbny
This is the worst poll you have done
I am effectively vetoing your poll powers after this one
Replying to Jaz #hick_dead This seems extremely niche, which I enjoy but I don't know ANYTHING about ANYTHING about what you just said, im sorry
That's what the video links are for. So you can get informed opinions on their feats. (the Australian Fast Bowler one is a 1 minute out of character interview, followed by a 10 minute compilation)
true
it was a sign from above
should pirate do a poll
- yes9 votes · 64%
- no5 votes · 36%
14 votes Poll closed
Friday, August 28, 2026
I have been wondering why this doesnt exist yet, and now it does.
https://www.ternary-computing.com/preorder/preorder_en.html
- 1
Replying to legorhin #jazardly I have been wondering why this doesnt exist yet, and now it does. https://www.ternary-computing.com/preorder/preorder_en.html
because switching between on and off
If you can evaluate more than 2 states, you're better off dumping resources into quantum
I'm actually coming around to this, it has no application, but it does seem fun
the sort of thing I could see a university building an undergrad course/lab around
I think there's no pure compute application
but I would be curious for signals with a high number of symbols, if the curve of a ternary processor ever crossed over into being more efficient than a significantly more powerful binary processor
I would assume the same, you wouldn't be able to miniaturize it anywhere near as efficiently
even if 2-state microelectronics aren't actually "on/off"
yeah, I think you could make a really cool lab around it
and because it's going to be friendly to less cutting-edge equipment, you can probably actually work on larger chips in a normal setting
I gaurentee you there will be niche math edgecases where doing something like this is beneficial, but this does not seem like something that will beat out binary computations
In my courses, we just refer to them as trinary units
I also would not call them trits
bits makes sense to shorten because it both sounds good, and also that is the most common unit you would use (second most common being natural units or nats)
at higher levels of abstraction, we're really good at modulation, look at some of the absurd WiFi7 QAM standards
I think there is probably some niche region, where a trinary microcontroller could more efficiently perform
Replying to Phijkchu_Pikachu #klombak bits makes sense to shorten because it both sounds good, and also that is the most common unit you would use (second most common being natural units or nats)
it also sounds good because it has real world application and understanding