if you were talking to someone high-functioning, but clearly off
general
Jump to date
Saturday, July 25, 2026
I think it can be, but the yes option is not worded in a way I would vote for it so I abstain
I think for sure you can use it as one, but no one is using it that way when they say someone/something is retarded
I don't use the word myself, but I don't think it's necessarily that strong of a word. I don't know why it suddenly became a slur. I remember seeing someone use it casually in another server I'm in a few years back and someone got really annoyed at the guy using it and I didn't understand why.
It barely registers as a contentious word, let alone a slur
I think it has more ability to be used as a slur than 99.9% of words in the english dictionary, but no one uses it that way
I don't think it's even close to slur class
where words like "Cunt" are hard to divorce from ever not being a slur
I think that is because no one uses it that way and it is just a normal word to say
Cunt isn't a slur
cunt is even less of a slur than retard
what is your definition of a slur lol
Vibes
I think to be a slur it has to be something you would only ever use, or concieve of ever using, in reference to the thing the slur is against
if I call someone a nigger, it is clear what I am implying by inference
retard is on shaky ground, but at its core is refering to you being mentally infirm
if I call you a cunt, I am basically more rudely calling you a vagina, which I would not consider calling someone a vagina a slur more than I would calling someone a retard (I would not consider either to be a slur)
retard has general utility as a word, same as stupid, idiodic, insane, etc.
But as an insult, it is no different to calling someone "low-IQ" which make me hard pressed to say its a slur, retard isn't a specific affliction, you don't catch "retard disease" there's no uniform group like there are for genders/races
I find "Autistic" more insulting than retard
still not a slur
You would, wouldn't you
but I think it at least is attacking a specific group
versus the broad category of "every person of lower-than-average intelligence"
or w/e the actual cutoff is for being a clinical retard
I think retard has stronger connotations than lower than average
I would not say someone who is 90IQ is a retard. The image implied is moreso 75 or lower
I think I am basically saying not only are you below average, you are nonfunctional if I am calling you a retard
isn't 70IQ a literal vegetable though
Yeah, and if I am calling you a retard, I mean you are basically a vegtable
there's the cutoff for retard that's 90, and the cutoff for vegetable which I think is 65-70 or thereabouts
at which point you're not a person
Apparently the historic cutoff was 85
Okay, spooky, read googles AI thing I just got and tell me its not a slur
you are basically calling them black
rather than a number, since IQs are supposed to just be a bell curve
it's the bottom X% of people
and I've always assumed the bottom ~20% are probably retard-class
I have never assumed it to be that exclusive
so yeah, somewhere around here
Yeah was about to say, standard dev is about 15
Anyways the fact that they had to raise the cutoff for black people is all I need to say
my case rests
its a slur
After this research, I am voting yes
I don't think it is a slur, however I am careful about who I say it around https://www.instagram.com/p/DY6ZXVQOkVJ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
