general

we are not at risk, the idea is it is just another easy method to hit the lowest common denominator, and it did not need to happen

yeah okay name your url

http://fortnite.zip

lol

see

it's real

http://rance.zip/

http://niggers.zip

http://untitled.zip/

I don't think it's the file that's risky Max

i really dont think its

a bad thing

retards will fall for it anwyays

and chrome blocks automatic downloads on pages that close

It is bad because its retarded and they did not need to do this

i like more domains

because it lets u make funny names

I think the trick would be to host a file website.zip at the domain website.zip

does anyone have win.zip yet

thats a good one

http://win.zip/

http://7.zip/

All this said, if josh gets his .net repo'd some how, he should get kiwifarms.zip

I think that is a banger name

and then within the .zip file, I think you'd have way more attack vectors to execute code in-browser, that is beyond what you could get away via javascript

maybe I'm wrong, or missing something

http://un.zip/

winzip unzip and sevenzip

all registered

domain squatters r sooo lame

but I think the way it would treat it was you were accessing a remote file via your browser, aliased as a website

which is probably doable now

so idk if this really changes anything

Very easy to do and some lucrative money so not surprising

i like

the first two

but I feel like there's something I'm missing

that's not just "lol DL this file"

based

it doesnt create any new attack vectors

A lot of people bought domains to redirect to their actual sites

It's just dumb

that is what I am seeing if you search site:.zip

and click around

It's not like

Anyone is actually buying .zip/.mov over real domains

http://killall.zip/

They didn't need to even bother making it

It just creates issues

really people should be trying to make the next .io

cuz .io is too expensive now

used to b like 5 bcuks

now its like 37

Oh I remember seeing this, probably the dumbest money grab ever. I am hoping for a .jpg or .png domain tho

I'm hoping they give us .cum

I'm routing for someone to actually make use of these for a big scam

.nut

realistically

we shoudl eb able to have any TLD we want

there's zero reason to not allow it

^

yep

i mean we'll probably have to have that

probably have to limit it to X characters

in like 30 years

jsut make it like 3-16 characters

what's the longest TLD rn?

ok Max, compromise

you can have any custom TLD you want, that's 5-16 char

uhhh

.museum?

but <4 is reserved for ICANN, governments, and Google

TRAVELERSINSURANCE

is the longest

phijkchu.travelersinsurance

let's go

.BANANAREPUBLIC