general

yes

and it stains the view of the source for me, and it makes me feel and think worse of it, while i also think a bit worse of it

It doesnt make it THE WORST or horrible

that part is what doesn't make sense

how does it stain it

its just a factor to me

I think that is silly, but the source being stained for you is understandable I guess

spooky put the words right earlier

tbh i was ignoring spooky

oof, I'm hurt

Dialga, this comes down to the fact that we can ignore a fandom but it seems to get to max more

"Pika, when someone on the internet, says a load of dumb shit over the years, or shit that you don't like doesn't that make you less likely to enjoy engaging with them, or take them seriously when you do They've poisoned their own brand, their image"

My response to that is still valid imo

the people have poisoned the brand of the source to me though

that is justification to hate the fandom

good justification in fact

that's justification against a fandom yes

Max connects fandoms to the thing the fandoms are fans of, It is silly, but it cannot be helped

but i the whole community for the game is represented by one thing in majority, doesnt that show something about the face of the game

no not really

Almost like the fandom is an embarrassment

the fandom acts the way it does on it's own

How people make an association between things is not necessarily reasonable

But cannot be helped

if all people see of the fandom of your source though without knowing of the source

i guess thats the best way to put it

Max, the point of this though is to explain why when you say something is bad and your first argument is the fandom, myself and dialga do not take that seriously

Imagine judging a lightbulb for providing the light needed to commit a murder Kappa

thats a shitty extreme that doesnt even work

You do not need to commit a murder in the light

checkmate athiests

hence the kappa max

sorry im kappa blind

i can only see kappas

Turn on the light next time

the emote doesnt work for me

kappa

lol pika

also pika

reword this

Alright, what I meant to say is

Explain why when you say something is bad and your first argument is the fandom

oh

When you say something is bad, a lot of the time your first argument is the fandom is cancer

yeah, because thats the strongest argument

kappa

which kind of discredits you saying it is bad because I literally don't care

It’s only thing you can easily know

If you want myself (and probably dialga and anyone else who was arguing against you) to take your arguments more seriously, you should consider not using arguments we find irrelevant

that is all I meant

I mean if you want real reasons: >DUDE META XD >It's soo deeep!!!! >Hey its a VN where you uhh make desciso- JK XD >bad writing >DELET THE GAME FILES FOR SECRETS XD >lets bait you with an actual cute girl and then you can never have her :( >DUDE MONIKA XDDDDD >CHOO CHOO RAILROADS

lol

Hehe suicide

true

>SUICIDE, its so deep

I like DDLC, and those just seem to tell me you wished it was just an actual dating sim

which is fair

i just wished it was actually good

ithad the setup

I thought we decided ddlc was bad

I think it is a good game

I like a lot of things gent

er

VN

I would not say good, but I enjoyed it

i still think it would of been better as a dating sim

not really a game

but

even as the meta shit it is

its just bad writing, theres no real VN part

I liked the idea of it tbh

If it was better executed iw ould of liked it

and I do not really play VN so the no real VN part did not bother me

VNs are already unappealing to me

instead its just "DUDE CREEPY TEXT OWO WEIRD IMAGES"

and then "JUST MONIKA XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD"

I have played 1 VN which was whats it called

it's parodying Dating sims while also trying to subvert expectations

it is good for the first time

KAKARAKAKAKARARARA