general

fuck off bopit

that is his debate tactic

you have never once been right in a debate we have had

lmao

fuck you too asshole

yeah b/c you stall with strawmans

Just because you forget what you say does not mean I am strawmanning you when I bring it up

and I get tired of arguing

should just stall with hp potions

bopit, you literally say things, I quote them back to you and argue against what you say, then you claim you did not say something

tbh

true

oof

oof

Bopit use "no u" on pika more

he is too toxic already

it's his weakness

kappa

lol

It is clear that you lot seem to think I am being unreasonable, I don't fucking know what you want from me

Your firstborn

I am being as reasonable as I fucking can

Please and thank you

reasonably unreasonable tbh

several people are typing

Pika, you're always bad at explaining your positions

Anything short of homosexual intercourse is cold-hearted

apparently so

And it's made worse by you having to have special unique positions to begin with

I am not tying to have a special snowflake position though

Look pika you're make it look like that lowering your standards is a bad thing, and not considering internet people in the realm of possibility of friendship is in the right

wait what is wrong with a special snowflake position

You've made all these unnecessary rules and qualifiers Pika, on what you should be able to just split down a line

its fine to be different I think

just don't go and boast on reddit about it

i like how

bopit is just

Why should I have to split it down a line though. What the fuck is wrong with wanting things to mean something

Then make it an exclusive line

what the fuck is the point of the word friend if everyone is one

No one ever said everybody has to be one

"Pssh, I have no friends, nothin personnel."

several people are typing

no one is saying you should make everyone your friend pika

why can't everyone be a friend tbh

then what the fuck was max arguing about

My point is, you bring up things like the internet, or duration, or any number of other metrics on which you decide a persons friend suitability

max is arguing that internet people should be a possibillity

instead of an end all no

When you should just make the arbitrary decision as to which side of the line they fall on

When you say "none of you internet fucks are my friends" and then have to make a bunch of qualifiers as to why that is

oh boi

new nickname

It's worse than just saying you don't consider them friends

Okay, then let me clarify. When I say I do not make friends with internet people, I mean that based on how I treat the internet, the people I meat on there can never really meet my standard for what I consider a friend. That is a consequence of them being people I met on the internet, not that they are from the internet

>a consequence of them being people I met on the internet

See that right there

tbf, internet interaction can be kind of impersonal

That's what I mean

oof, so the moment we joined this cult, we were set to 'internet person'

I don't know any of you, or any internet person

what the fuck do you want from me

If I knew you, you would not be an internet person

the moment you meet pika in real life opens up the possibillity of friendship is what you are saying

see I know a phijkchu pikachu

I cannot befriend people I do not know

idk if he knows me or not tho

i think the problem stems in what you define as "know someone" pika

clearly

care explaining then?

Apparently I am trash at explaining things, why fucking bother

just treat me as a bad person, that seems easier

Umbreon, the problem is that Pika's friendship agreement would have to come with a custom thesaurus