it does not
general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
it is a worthless metric
I am talking subjectively though
Somehow I feel like your definitions of respect and what it entails are different
that is also likely
this is likely a matter of semantics
no
Then yeah, completely different definitions
I reserve respect for those who adhere to their principles
fully, without condition
Which is why I respect almost no one
including myself
I can respect myself on my deathbed if I deserve it
then you are inconsistent. That is something I strive to avoid myself
I suppose that is a way to put it, except you can abandon a principle imo
you just have to either adhere to your principles, or realize under new information your principle is wrong and stop following it
you cannot have both
you likely do, just not anything strong
It takes a strange person to not have some set of principles
my definition of principles is just a guiding methodology for conducting oneself
would be weird to have no principles at all
Altruism is funny
Even partial altruism
But yeah, I hope the takeaway from this is that we should bring back bullying
lol
see, I do not distinguish
if there is a valid reason, I am willing to accept that anything can be a valid reason
Well, I can't speak for others, but I am going to continue to banter
banter is bullying
imo
under that definiton though loveland
all bullying can be banter
if the person being bullyed banters back
that is what I advocate for
banter back