general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Friday, December 15, 2017
Yes
Dad
I stream! http://twitch.tv/simpleflips I tweet! http://twitter.com/simpleflips Discord with me! http://discord.gg/simpleflips Cool shirts exist here: https:/...
www.youtube.com- 10_19 5
ooh
nice shoutout
High quality content
A Man on a flight
nani
Have to play a game that won't have its music claimed
Get that ad money
Look at all the new people we've got this week alone
Saturday, December 16, 2017
Just think how many people we'll get when PkmnRob starts back up again
excuse me but i'm not a rando
Dialga was the shitty version of Palkia
For all the suckers who didn't buy Pearl
Dailga can destroy fairies still unlike those other wuss dragons
FIX MY SITE (YIAY #385)
Make your own website today! http://www.squarespace.com/jack Use code JACK to save 10% off your 1st purchase! Keep sending your new website ideas to https://...
youtu.be
CDC gets list of forbidden words: fetus, transgender, diversity
Agency analysts are told to avoid these 7 banned words and phrases in budget documents
www.washingtonpost.comI read that as being a good thing
Non-politicizing budget line-items leads to less scrutiny
And almost always, the shit that gets raised around small sums of money being spent on these things is always disproportionate
Nobody will notice
It'll go in as a line-item expenditure that matches another 100
I'm a pirate so not exaclty big on politics, but it seems like a bad idea to ban the phrases" evidence-based" and "science-based"
Just like in your Windows task manager, you have 10+ svc host processes
It's banning terms to be used on government budget reports
To expediate the process of accounting these expenditures
The public should literally never be scrutinizing line items
No they don't. This is a push to remove details from expense reports
Lest ever bit of expenditure get scrutinized.
Feds are tired of people raising a fuss over the language on these reports
I'm sure the actual lists of words/phrases they're tryign to filter out are 100x as long
These were leaked to cause a fuss
Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget
That's a nice way of saying leaked
The post isn't writing a story about the policy shift, because nobody would care
They're writing a story about 7 "controversial" words that will no loger appear on expense reports
As fed to them by a source within the CDC
you know it doesn't really seem like either of you plan on seriously considering what the other guy is saying
