general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Monday, November 13, 2017
That's dirtier than the smut your wrote yesterday Max
just have a bunch of these pinned kek
The case you posted seems to be more an issue of how the guy was handled
and not the loliporn
That's his complaint, not the trial case
Oh
will look for the supreme court case then
1 sec
It goes back and forth for a while, judge throws it out because the characters are not real people
No trial, no precedent set sadly
then it does not matter
supreme court already ruled that childporn applies to imaginary humans
so it is illegal
I wish
tbh
Children don't Exist
The interpretation by this judge was that a loli depiction of a real kid would be illegal
but some generic loli would not be
Simulating a real person using computer aided imagery
In October 2012, after being reported August 2011 by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography"Fuck wives
Ended up being charged because the lolis were committing incest, not because they were 11
that's not a trap
Kappa
just go furry pika, they're not humans Kappa
Furry Master Race Kapap
fucking horses, how japanese
Lolita is a legal movie
lolita (the novel) is illegal in Canada iirc
You were already claimed Max, start walking
Really?
Yes
Wow, suprised by that Pika
we have some weird fucking laws
can we just lock max in the basement?